Form 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For
the quarterly period ended March 29, 2009
Commission
File Number 0-9286
COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
56-0950585 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
4100 Coca-Cola Plaza, Charlotte, North Carolina 28211
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(704) 557-4400
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller
reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o |
|
Accelerated filer þ |
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
Class |
|
Outstanding at April 30, 2009 |
Common Stock, $1.00 Par Value
|
|
7,141,447 |
Class B Common Stock, $1.00 Par Value
|
|
2,021,882 |
COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 29, 2009
INDEX
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
In Thousands (Except Per Share Data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
336,261 |
|
|
$ |
337,674 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
189,132 |
|
|
|
197,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
147,129 |
|
|
|
139,918 |
|
Selling, delivery and administrative expenses |
|
|
125,988 |
|
|
|
136,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
21,141 |
|
|
|
3,675 |
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
9,258 |
|
|
|
10,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
11,883 |
|
|
|
(6,759 |
) |
Income tax provision (benefit) |
|
|
3,060 |
|
|
|
(2,085 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
8,823 |
|
|
|
(4,674 |
) |
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to the
noncontrolling interest |
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
(339 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
Consolidated |
|
$ |
8,531 |
|
|
$ |
(4,335 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
$ |
.93 |
|
|
$ |
(.47 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of Common Stock
shares outstanding |
|
|
6,857 |
|
|
|
6,644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B Common Stock |
|
$ |
.93 |
|
|
$ |
(.47 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of Class B Common
Stock shares outstanding |
|
|
2,306 |
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
$ |
.93 |
|
|
$ |
(.47 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of Common Stock
shares outstanding assuming dilution |
|
|
9,174 |
|
|
|
9,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B Common Stock |
|
$ |
.93 |
|
|
$ |
(.47 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of Class B Common
Stock shares outstanding assuming dilution |
|
|
2,317 |
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
$ |
.25 |
|
|
$ |
.25 |
|
Class B Common Stock |
|
$ |
.25 |
|
|
$ |
.25 |
|
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
3
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
In Thousands (Except Share Data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited |
|
|
|
March 29, |
|
|
Dec. 28, |
|
|
March 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
37,996 |
|
|
$ |
45,407 |
|
|
$ |
9,930 |
|
Accounts receivable, trade, less allowance for
doubtful accounts of $1,820, $1,188 and $858,
respectively |
|
|
97,647 |
|
|
|
99,849 |
|
|
|
107,412 |
|
Accounts receivable from The Coca-Cola Company |
|
|
20,857 |
|
|
|
3,454 |
|
|
|
14,158 |
|
Accounts receivable, other |
|
|
11,969 |
|
|
|
12,990 |
|
|
|
6,655 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
72,924 |
|
|
|
65,497 |
|
|
|
65,556 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
23,261 |
|
|
|
21,121 |
|
|
|
24,881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
264,654 |
|
|
|
248,318 |
|
|
|
228,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
329,896 |
|
|
|
338,156 |
|
|
|
358,626 |
|
Leased property under capital leases, net |
|
|
55,051 |
|
|
|
66,730 |
|
|
|
69,829 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
40,260 |
|
|
|
33,937 |
|
|
|
35,662 |
|
Franchise rights, net |
|
|
520,672 |
|
|
|
520,672 |
|
|
|
520,672 |
|
Goodwill, net |
|
|
102,049 |
|
|
|
102,049 |
|
|
|
102,049 |
|
Other identifiable intangible assets, net |
|
|
5,770 |
|
|
|
5,910 |
|
|
|
4,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,318,352 |
|
|
$ |
1,315,772 |
|
|
$ |
1,319,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
4
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
In Thousands (Except Share Data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited |
|
|
|
March 29, |
|
|
Dec. 28, |
|
|
March 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of debt |
|
$ |
66,693 |
|
|
$ |
176,693 |
|
|
$ |
42,100 |
|
Current portion of obligations under capital leases |
|
|
3,557 |
|
|
|
2,781 |
|
|
|
2,645 |
|
Accounts payable, trade |
|
|
41,569 |
|
|
|
42,383 |
|
|
|
44,887 |
|
Accounts payable to The Coca-Cola Company |
|
|
33,384 |
|
|
|
35,311 |
|
|
|
22,610 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
71,830 |
|
|
|
57,504 |
|
|
|
55,540 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
13,629 |
|
|
|
23,285 |
|
|
|
12,935 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
13,606 |
|
|
|
8,139 |
|
|
|
14,337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
244,268 |
|
|
|
346,096 |
|
|
|
195,054 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
140,932 |
|
|
|
139,338 |
|
|
|
165,988 |
|
Pension and postretirement benefit obligations |
|
|
104,898 |
|
|
|
107,005 |
|
|
|
33,645 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
106,863 |
|
|
|
107,037 |
|
|
|
95,045 |
|
Obligations under capital leases |
|
|
62,124 |
|
|
|
74,833 |
|
|
|
76,935 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
524,757 |
|
|
|
414,757 |
|
|
|
591,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,183,842 |
|
|
|
1,189,066 |
|
|
|
1,158,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 14) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, $1.00 par value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized 30,000,000 shares; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued 10,203,821, 9,706,051 and 9,706,051 shares,
respectively |
|
|
10,204 |
|
|
|
9,706 |
|
|
|
9,706 |
|
Class B Common Stock, $1.00 par value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized 10,000,000 shares; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued 2,649,996, 3,127,766 and 3,127,766 shares,
respectively |
|
|
2,649 |
|
|
|
3,127 |
|
|
|
3,127 |
|
Capital in excess of par value |
|
|
103,562 |
|
|
|
103,582 |
|
|
|
102,732 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
85,261 |
|
|
|
79,021 |
|
|
|
72,453 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(56,601 |
) |
|
|
(57,873 |
) |
|
|
(12,925 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145,075 |
|
|
|
137,563 |
|
|
|
175,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less-Treasury stock, at cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common 3,062,374 shares |
|
|
60,845 |
|
|
|
60,845 |
|
|
|
60,845 |
|
Class B Common 628,114 shares |
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity of Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated |
|
|
83,821 |
|
|
|
76,309 |
|
|
|
113,839 |
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
50,689 |
|
|
|
50,397 |
|
|
|
47,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
134,510 |
|
|
|
126,706 |
|
|
|
161,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,318,352 |
|
|
$ |
1,315,772 |
|
|
$ |
1,319,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
5
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY (UNAUDITED)
In Thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B |
|
|
in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Excess of |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Par Value |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
of CCBCC |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance on
December 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
9,706 |
|
|
$ |
3,107 |
|
|
$ |
102,469 |
|
|
$ |
79,227 |
|
|
$ |
(12,751 |
) |
|
$ |
(61,254 |
) |
|
$ |
120,504 |
|
|
$ |
48,005 |
|
|
$ |
168,509 |
|
Comprehensive
income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,335 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,335 |
) |
|
|
(339 |
) |
|
|
(4,674 |
) |
Foreign currency
translation
adjustments,
net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
Pension and postretirement
benefit adjustments,
net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive
income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,395 |
) |
|
|
(339 |
) |
|
|
(4,734 |
) |
Adjustment to change
measurement date for
SFAS No. 158, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(153 |
) |
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(267 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(267 |
) |
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common ($.25 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,661 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,661 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,661 |
) |
Class B Common
($.25 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(625 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(625 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(625 |
) |
Issuance of 20,000
shares of
Class B
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance on
March 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
9,706 |
|
|
$ |
3,127 |
|
|
$ |
102,732 |
|
|
$ |
72,453 |
|
|
$ |
(12,925 |
) |
|
$ |
(61,254 |
) |
|
$ |
113,839 |
|
|
$ |
47,666 |
|
|
$ |
161,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance on
December 28, 2008 |
|
$ |
9,706 |
|
|
$ |
3,127 |
|
|
$ |
103,582 |
|
|
$ |
79,021 |
|
|
$ |
(57,873 |
) |
|
$ |
(61,254 |
) |
|
$ |
76,309 |
|
|
$ |
50,397 |
|
|
$ |
126,706 |
|
Comprehensive
income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,531 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
8,823 |
|
Foreign currency
translation
adjustments,
net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
Pension and postretirement
benefit adjustments,
net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive
income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,803 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
10,095 |
|
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common ($.25 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,661 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,661 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,661 |
) |
Class B Common
($.25 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(630 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(630 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(630 |
) |
Issuance of 20,000
shares of Class B
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of Class B
Common Stock into
Common Stock |
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
(498 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance on
March 29, 2009 |
|
$ |
10,204 |
|
|
$ |
2,649 |
|
|
$ |
103,562 |
|
|
$ |
85,261 |
|
|
$ |
(56,601 |
) |
|
$ |
(61,254 |
) |
|
$ |
83,821 |
|
|
$ |
50,689 |
|
|
$ |
134,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
6
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
In Thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
8,823 |
|
|
$ |
(4,674 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
15,060 |
|
|
|
16,629 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(747 |
) |
|
|
(2,085 |
) |
(Gain) loss on sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(250 |
) |
|
|
369 |
|
Amortization of debt costs |
|
|
603 |
|
|
|
615 |
|
Amortization of deferred gain related to terminated
interest rate agreements |
|
|
(850 |
) |
|
|
(426 |
) |
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
283 |
|
Increase in current assets less current liabilities |
|
|
(13,087 |
) |
|
|
(28,879 |
) |
(Increase) decrease in other noncurrent assets |
|
|
(6,814 |
) |
|
|
147 |
|
Increase (decrease) in other noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
(1,616 |
) |
|
|
1,753 |
|
Other |
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
(152 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
(7,100 |
) |
|
|
(11,636 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
1,723 |
|
|
|
(16,310 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(6,249 |
) |
|
|
(14,835 |
) |
Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
Investment in plastic bottle manufacturing cooperative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(729 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(6,114 |
) |
|
|
(15,390 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from lines of credit, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,700 |
|
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(2,291 |
) |
|
|
(2,286 |
) |
Principal payments on capital lease obligations |
|
|
(643 |
) |
|
|
(635 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
(3,020 |
) |
|
|
31,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash |
|
|
(7,411 |
) |
|
|
59 |
|
Cash at beginning of period |
|
|
45,407 |
|
|
|
9,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at end of period |
|
$ |
37,996 |
|
|
$ |
9,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant non-cash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of Class B Common Stock in connection with stock award |
|
$ |
1,130 |
|
|
$ |
1,171 |
|
Capital lease obligations incurred |
|
|
660 |
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
7
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
1. Significant Accounting Policies
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
and its majority owned subsidiaries (the Company). All significant intercompany accounts and
transactions have been eliminated.
The consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments which, in the opinion of management,
are necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. All such
adjustments are of a normal, recurring nature.
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The accounting policies followed in the presentation of interim financial results are consistent
with those followed on an annual basis. These policies are presented in Note 1 to the consolidated
financial statements included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 28, 2008 filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
Effective December 29, 2008, the beginning of the first quarter of 2009 (Q1 2009), the Company
implemented Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 160, Noncontrolling Interest
in Consolidated Financial Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51. This Statement changes the
accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary (commonly
referred to previously as minority interest). Piedmont Coca-Cola Bottling Partnership (Piedmont)
is the Companys only subsidiary that has a noncontrolling interest. Noncontrolling interest
income of $.3 million in Q1 2009 and noncontrolling interest
loss of $.3 million in the first quarter of 2008 (Q1
2008) have been
reclassified to be included in net income on the Companys consolidated statement of operations.
In addition, the amount of consolidated net income attributable to both the Company and the
noncontrolling interest are shown on the Companys consolidated statement of operations.
Noncontrolling interest related to Piedmont totaled $50.7 million, $50.4 million and $47.4 million
at March 29, 2009, December 28, 2008 and March 30, 2008, respectively. These amounts have been
reclassified as noncontrolling interest in the equity section of the Companys consolidated balance
sheets.
2. Seasonality of Business
Historically, operating results for the first quarter of the fiscal year have not been
representative of results for the entire fiscal year. Business seasonality results primarily from
higher unit sales of the Companys products in the second and third quarters versus the first and
fourth quarters of the fiscal year. Fixed costs, such as depreciation expense, are not
significantly impacted by business seasonality.
8
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
3. Piedmont Coca-Cola Bottling Partnership
On July 2, 1993, the Company and The Coca-Cola Company formed Piedmont to distribute and market
nonalcoholic beverages primarily in portions of North Carolina and South Carolina. The Company
provides a portion of the nonalcoholic beverage products to Piedmont at cost and receives
a fee for managing the operations of Piedmont pursuant to a management agreement. These
intercompany transactions are eliminated in the consolidated financial statements.
Noncontrolling interest as of March 29, 2009, December 28, 2008 and March 30, 2008 represents the
portion of Piedmont owned by The Coca-Cola Company. The Coca-Cola Companys interest in Piedmont
was 22.7% for all periods presented.
4. Inventories
Inventories were summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 29, |
|
Dec. 28, |
|
March 30, |
In Thousands |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
|
Finished products |
|
$ |
45,781 |
|
|
$ |
36,418 |
|
|
$ |
41,822 |
|
Manufacturing materials |
|
|
9,091 |
|
|
|
12,620 |
|
|
|
6,923 |
|
Plastic shells, plastic pallets and other inventories |
|
|
18,052 |
|
|
|
16,459 |
|
|
|
16,811 |
|
|
Total inventories |
|
$ |
72,924 |
|
|
$ |
65,497 |
|
|
$ |
65,556 |
|
|
5. Property, Plant and Equipment
The principal categories and estimated useful lives of property, plant and equipment were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 29, |
|
Dec. 28, |
|
March 30, |
|
Estimated |
In Thousands |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
|
Useful Lives |
|
Land |
|
$ |
12,167 |
|
|
$ |
12,167 |
|
|
$ |
12,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings |
|
|
109,403 |
|
|
|
109,384 |
|
|
|
110,721 |
|
|
10-50 years |
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
119,277 |
|
|
|
118,934 |
|
|
|
106,575 |
|
|
5-20 years |
Transportation equipment |
|
|
175,984 |
|
|
|
176,084 |
|
|
|
174,785 |
|
|
4-17 years |
Furniture and fixtures |
|
|
37,629 |
|
|
|
38,254 |
|
|
|
38,587 |
|
|
4-10 years |
Cold drink dispensing equipment |
|
|
316,487 |
|
|
|
319,188 |
|
|
|
325,586 |
|
|
6-15 years |
Leasehold and land improvements |
|
|
60,154 |
|
|
|
60,142 |
|
|
|
60,047 |
|
|
5-20 years |
Software for internal use |
|
|
63,479 |
|
|
|
59,786 |
|
|
|
52,155 |
|
|
3-10 years |
Construction in progress |
|
|
3,672 |
|
|
|
4,891 |
|
|
|
13,336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment, at cost |
|
|
898,252 |
|
|
|
898,830 |
|
|
|
894,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation
and amortization |
|
|
568,356 |
|
|
|
560,674 |
|
|
|
535,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
$ |
329,896 |
|
|
$ |
338,156 |
|
|
$ |
358,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
5. Property, Plant and Equipment
Depreciation and amortization expense was $15.1 million and $16.6 million in Q1 2009 and
Q1 2008, respectively. These amounts included amortization expense for leased
property under capital leases.
The Company changed the useful lives of certain cold drink dispensing equipment in Q1 2009 to
better reflect actual useful lives. The change in useful lives reduced depreciation expense in Q1
2009 by $1.2 million.
6. Leased Property Under Capital Leases
Leased property under capital leases was summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 29, |
|
Dec. 28, |
|
March 30, |
|
Estimated |
In Thousands |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
|
Useful Lives |
|
Leased property under capital leases |
|
$ |
76,877 |
|
|
$ |
88,619 |
|
|
$ |
88,619 |
|
|
3-20 years |
Less: Accumulated amortization |
|
|
21,826 |
|
|
|
21,889 |
|
|
|
18,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leased property under capital leases, net |
|
$ |
55,051 |
|
|
$ |
66,730 |
|
|
$ |
69,829 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 29, 2009, real estate represented $54.4 million of the leased property under capital
leases and $52.7 million of this real estate is leased from related parties as described in Note
19 to the consolidated financial statements.
The Company modified a related party lease and terminated a second lease in Q1 2009. See Note 19
to the consolidated financial statements for additional information on the lease modification.
7. Franchise Rights and Goodwill
There was no change in the carrying amounts of franchise rights and goodwill in the periods
presented. The Company performs its annual impairment test of franchise rights and goodwill as of
the first day of the fourth quarter. During Q1 2009, the Company believes it did not experience
any events or changes in circumstances that indicated the carrying amounts of the Companys
franchise rights or goodwill exceeded fair values. As such, the Company did not perform an
interim impairment test during Q1 2009 and did not record any impairments of franchise rights or
goodwill.
10
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
8. Other Identifiable Intangible Assets
Other identifiable intangible assets were summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 29, |
|
Dec. 28, |
|
March 30, |
|
Estimated |
In Thousands |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
|
Useful Lives |
|
Other identifiable intangible assets |
|
$ |
8,665 |
|
|
$ |
8,909 |
|
|
$ |
6,599 |
|
|
1-20 years |
Less: Accumulated amortization |
|
|
2,895 |
|
|
|
2,999 |
|
|
|
2,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other identifiable intangible assets, net |
|
$ |
5,770 |
|
|
$ |
5,910 |
|
|
$ |
4,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other identifiable intangible assets primarily represent customer relationships and
distribution rights.
9. Other Accrued Liabilities
Other accrued liabilities were summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 29, |
|
Dec. 28, |
|
March 30, |
In Thousands |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
|
Accrued marketing costs |
|
$ |
7,591 |
|
|
$ |
9,001 |
|
|
$ |
6,406 |
|
Accrued insurance costs |
|
|
17,540 |
|
|
|
17,132 |
|
|
|
15,281 |
|
Accrued taxes (other than income taxes) |
|
|
1,880 |
|
|
|
374 |
|
|
|
2,080 |
|
Employee benefit plan accruals |
|
|
11,184 |
|
|
|
8,626 |
|
|
|
8,936 |
|
Checks and transfers yet to be presented for payment from
zero balance cash account |
|
|
20,339 |
|
|
|
11,074 |
|
|
|
13,550 |
|
All other accrued liabilities |
|
|
13,296 |
|
|
|
11,297 |
|
|
|
9,287 |
|
|
Total other accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
71,830 |
|
|
$ |
57,504 |
|
|
$ |
55,540 |
|
|
11
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
10. Debt
Debt was summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
Interest |
|
March 29, |
|
Dec. 28, |
|
March 30, |
In Thousands |
|
Maturity |
|
Rate |
|
Paid |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
|
Lines of Credit |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Varies |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
42,100 |
|
Debentures |
|
2009 |
|
|
7.20 |
% |
|
Semi-annually |
|
|
57,440 |
|
|
|
57,440 |
|
|
|
57,440 |
|
Debentures |
|
2009 |
|
|
6.375 |
% |
|
Semi-annually |
|
|
119,253 |
|
|
|
119,253 |
|
|
|
119,253 |
|
Senior Notes |
|
2012 |
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
Semi-annually |
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
Senior Notes |
|
2015 |
|
|
5.30 |
% |
|
Semi-annually |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
Senior Notes |
|
2016 |
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
Semi-annually |
|
|
164,757 |
|
|
|
164,757 |
|
|
|
164,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
591,450 |
|
|
|
591,450 |
|
|
|
633,550 |
|
Less: Current portion of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,693 |
|
|
|
176,693 |
|
|
|
42,100 |
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
524,757 |
|
|
$ |
414,757 |
|
|
$ |
591,450 |
|
|
On March 8, 2007, the Company entered into a $200 million revolving credit facility ($200 million
facility), replacing its $100 million facility. The $200 million facility matures in March 2012
and includes an option to extend the term for an additional year at the discretion of the
participating banks. The $200 million facility bears interest at a floating base rate or a
floating rate of LIBOR plus an interest rate spread of .35%, dependent on the length of the term
of the borrowing. In addition, the Company must pay an annual facility fee of .10% of the
lenders aggregate commitments under the facility. Both the interest rate spread and the facility
fee are determined from a commonly-used pricing grid based on the Companys long-term senior
unsecured debt rating. The $200 million facility contains two financial covenants: a fixed
charges coverage ratio and a debt to operating cash flow ratio, each as defined in the credit
agreement. The fixed charges coverage ratio requires the Company to maintain a consolidated cash
flow to fixed charges ratio of 1.5 to 1 or higher. The operating cash flow ratio requires the
Company to maintain a debt to cash flow ratio of 6.0 to 1 or lower. On August 25, 2008, the
Company entered into an amendment to the $200 million facility. The amendment clarified that
charges incurred by the Company resulting from the Companys withdrawal from the Central States
Pension Fund (Central States) would be excluded from the calculations of the financial covenants
to the extent they are recognized before March 29, 2009 and do not exceed $15 million. See Note
18 to the consolidated financial statements for additional details on the withdrawal. The Company
is currently in compliance with these covenants and the amendment to the $200 million facility.
These covenants do not currently, and the Company does not anticipate
they will, restrict its liquidity or capital resources. On March 29, 2009, December 28, 2008 and March 30, 2008, the Company had no outstanding borrowings
under the $200 million facility.
12
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
10. Debt
The Company borrows periodically under an uncommitted line of credit provided from a bank
participating in the $200 million facility. This uncommitted line of credit made available at the
discretion of the participating bank was temporarily terminated in the fourth quarter of 2008. In
January 2009, the participating bank reinstated their uncommitted line of credit for $65 million.
This uncommitted line of credit was terminated after March 29, 2009.
After taking into account all of its interest rate hedging activities, the Company had a weighted
average interest rate of 5.6%, 5.9% and 5.9% for its debt and capital lease obligations as of March
29, 2009, December 28, 2008 and March 30, 2008, respectively. The Companys overall weighted
average interest rate on its debt and capital lease obligations was 5.6% for Q1 2009 compared to
5.9% for Q1 2008. As of March 29, 2009, approximately 4.6% of the Companys debt and capital lease
obligations of $657.1 million was subject to changes in short-term interest rates.
The Companys public debt is not subject to financial covenants but does limit the incurrence of
certain liens and encumbrances as well as the incurrence of indebtedness by the Companys
subsidiaries in excess of certain amounts.
All of the outstanding long-term debt has been issued by the Company with none being issued by any
of the Companys subsidiaries. There are no guarantees of the Companys debt.
In April 2009, the Company issued $110 million of unsecured 7% Senior Notes due in 2019. The
proceeds plus cash on hand were used to repay the $119.3 million
debt maturity on May 1, 2009. Current
portion of debt reflected the $176.7 million of debt maturing in May and July of 2009 less the $110
million of debt which was repaid from the proceeds of the 7% Senior Notes.
11. Derivative Financial Instruments
Interest
The Company periodically uses interest rate hedging products to modify risk from interest rate
fluctuations. The Company has historically altered its fixed/floating rate mix based upon
anticipated cash flows from operations relative to the Companys debt level and the potential
impact of changes in interest rates on the Companys overall financial condition. Sensitivity
analyses are performed to review the impact on the Companys financial position and coverage of
various interest rate movements. The Company does not use derivative financial instruments for
trading purposes nor does it use leveraged financial instruments.
On September 18, 2008, the Company terminated six outstanding interest rate swap agreements with a
notional amount of $225 million receiving $6.2 million in cash proceeds including $1.1 million for
previously accrued interest receivable. After accounting for previously accrued interest
receivable, the Company will amortize a
13
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
11. Derivative Financial Instruments
gain of $5.1 million over the remaining term of the underlying debt. During Q1 2009, $.4 million
of the gain was amortized. The remaining amount to be amortized is $4.3 million. All of the
Companys interest rate swap agreements were LIBOR-based.
Interest
rate swap agreements were summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 29, 2009 |
|
December 28, 2008 |
|
March 30, 2008 |
|
|
Notional |
|
Remaining |
|
Notional |
|
Remaining |
|
Notional |
|
Remaining |
In Thousands |
|
Amount |
|
Term |
|
Amount |
|
Term |
|
Amount |
|
Term |
|
Interest rate swap agreement floating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
|
1.2 years |
Interest rate swap agreement floating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
1.3 years |
Interest rate swap agreement floating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
4.7 years |
Interest rate swap agreement floating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
1.1 years |
Interest rate swap agreement floating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
7.0 years |
Interest rate swap agreement floating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
4.7 years |
The
counterparties to these contractual arrangements are major financial institutions with which
the Company also has other financial relationships. The Company uses several different financial
institutions for interest rate derivative contracts and commodity
derivative instruments, described below, to minimize the concentration of credit risk.
While the Company is exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by these
counterparties, the Company does not anticipate nonperformance by
these parties. The Company has
master agreements with the counterparties to its derivative financial agreements that provided for
net settlement of the derivative transactions.
Commodities
The Company is subject to the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in commodity prices. In
the normal course of business, the Company manages these risks through a variety of strategies,
including the use of derivative instruments. The Company does not use derivative instruments for
trading or speculative purposes. All derivative instruments are recorded at fair value as either
assets or liabilities in the Companys consolidated balance sheets. These derivative instruments
are not designated as hedging instruments under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, and are used as economic hedges to manage certain commodity
risk. Currently the Company has derivative instruments to hedge its
projected diesel fuel and aluminum
purchase requirements. These derivative instruments are marked to market on a periodic basis and recognized in
earnings consistent with the expense classification of the underlying hedged item.
The
Company uses derivative instruments to hedge all of its projected
diesel fuel purchases for 2009 and 2010. These
derivative instruments relate to diesel fuel used by the Companys delivery fleet.
At the end of Q1 2009, the Company began using derivative instruments
to hedge 75% of the
Companys projected 2010 aluminum purchase requirements.
Subsequent to Q1 2009, the Company entered into derivative contracts
to hedge 75% of the
Companys projected 2011 aluminum purchase requirements.
14
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
11. Derivative Financial Instruments
The following summarizes the gains and the classification in the consolidated statement
of operations of derivative instruments for Q1 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Thousands |
|
Classification of Gain |
|
Gain Recognized |
|
Fuel hedges |
|
Selling, delivery and administrative expenses |
|
$ |
1,451 |
|
Aluminum hedges |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
663 |
|
|
Total Gain |
|
|
|
$ |
2,114 |
|
|
The following summarizes the fair values and classification in the consolidated balance sheets of
derivative instruments held by the Company as of March 29, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 29, |
In Thousands |
|
Balance Sheet Classification |
|
2009 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum
hedges at fair market value |
|
Prepaid and other assets |
|
$ |
663 |
|
Unamortized cost of fuel hedging contracts |
|
Prepaid and other assets |
|
|
1,441 |
|
Unamortized cost of aluminum hedging contracts |
|
Prepaid and other assets |
|
|
1,197 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel hedges
at fair market value |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
215 |
|
In
addition, the Company paid $2.5 million in April 2009 to
enter aluminum hedging contracts relative to
the hedging of 75% of the Companys projected 2011
aluminum purchase requirements.
The
following table summarizes the Companys outstanding derivative
contracts as of March 29, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
Latest |
In Thousands |
|
Amount |
|
Maturity |
|
Diesel fuel hedging contracts
|
$ |
29,759 |
|
|
December 2010 |
|
Aluminum hedging contracts |
|
23,569 |
|
|
December 2010 |
|
In
addition, the notional amount of the derivative contracts entered into
subsequent to Q1 2009 to hedge 75% of the Companys projected 2011
aluminum purchase requirements was $29.6 million.
12. Fair Values of Financial Instruments
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating the fair values of
its financial instruments:
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable
The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate
carrying values due to the short maturity of these items.
Public Debt Securities
The fair values of the Companys public debt securities are based on estimated current market
prices.
15
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
12. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Non-Public Variable Rate Debt
The carrying amounts of the Companys variable rate borrowings approximate their fair values.
Deferred Compensation Plan Assets
The fair values of deferred compensation plan assets, which are held in mutual funds, are based
upon the quoted market value of the securities held within the mutual funds.
Derivative Financial Instruments
The fair values for the Companys interest rate swap, fuel hedging and aluminum hedging agreements
are based on current settlement values. Credit risk related to the derivative financial
instruments is managed by requiring high standards for it counterparties and periodic settlements.
The Company considers nonperformance risk in determining the fair value of derivative financial
instruments.
Letters of Credit
The fair values of the Companys letters of credit obtained from financial institutions are based
on the notional amounts of the instruments. These letters of credit primarily relate to the
Companys property and casualty insurance programs.
The carrying amounts and fair values of the Companys debt, deferred compensation plan assets,
derivative financial instruments and letters of credit were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 29, 2009 |
|
December 28, 2008 |
|
March 30, 2008 |
|
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
In Thousands |
|
Amount |
|
Value |
|
Amount |
|
Value |
|
Amount |
|
Value |
|
Public debt securities |
|
$ |
591,450 |
|
|
$ |
569,606 |
|
|
$ |
591,450 |
|
|
$ |
559,963 |
|
|
$ |
591,450 |
|
|
$ |
588,616 |
|
Non-public variable rate debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,100 |
|
|
|
42,100 |
|
Deferred compensation plan assets |
|
|
5,841 |
|
|
|
5,841 |
|
|
|
5,446 |
|
|
|
5,446 |
|
|
|
6,810 |
|
|
|
6,810 |
|
Interest rate swap agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,405 |
) |
|
|
(8,405 |
) |
Fuel hedging agreements |
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
1,985 |
|
|
|
1,985 |
|
|
|
(654 |
) |
|
|
(654 |
) |
Aluminum hedging agreements |
|
|
(663 |
) |
|
|
(663 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letters of credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,496 |
|
On September 18, 2008, the Company terminated all of its outstanding interest rate swap agreements.
The fair value of interest rate swap agreements at March 30, 2008 represented the estimated amount
the Company would have received upon termination of these agreements.
The fair values of the fuel hedging agreements at March 29, 2009 and December 28, 2008 represented
the estimated amount the Company would have paid upon termination of these agreements. The fair
value of the fuel hedging agreements at March 30, 2008 represented the estimated amount the Company
would have received upon termination of these agreements.
16
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
12. Fair Values of Financial Instruments
The fair value of the aluminum hedging agreements at March 29, 2009 represented the estimated
amount the Company would have received upon termination of these agreements.
The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurement
(SFAS No. 157) as of December 31, 2007, the beginning of Q1 2008, and there was no material
impact to the consolidated financial statements. SFAS No. 157 currently applies to all financial
assets and liabilities and for nonfinancial assets and liabilities recognized or disclosed at fair
value on a recurring basis. In February 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
issued FASB Staff Position SFAS No. 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which
deferred the application date of the provisions of SFAS No. 157 for all nonfinancial assets and
liabilities until Q1 2009 except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the
financial statements on a recurring basis. There was no material impact of the adoption of SFAS
No. 157 for nonfinancial assets and liabilities in Q1 2009, but
could have a material effect in the future. SFAS No. 157 requires disclosure that
establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. SFAS No. 157 is intended to enable the readers of financial statements to assess the
inputs used to develop those measurements by establishing a hierarchy for ranking the quality and
reliability of the information used to determine fair values. SFAS No. 157 requires that assets
and liabilities carried at fair value be classified and disclosed in one of the following
categories:
Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market
data.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.
The
following table summarizes, by assets and liabilities, the valuation of the Companys deferred compensation plan, aluminum hedging
agreements, fuel hedging agreements and interest rate swap agreements
for the categories above:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 29, 2009 |
|
December 28, 2008 |
|
March 30, 2008 |
In Thousands |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation plan assets |
|
$ |
5,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum hedging agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel hedging agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
654 |
|
Interest rate swap agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,405 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation plan liabilities |
|
|
5,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel hedging agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company maintains a non-qualified deferred compensation plan for certain executives and other
highly compensated employees. The investment assets are held in mutual funds. The fair value of
the mutual funds is based on the quoted market value of the securities held within the funds (Level 1).
The related deferred compensation liability represents the fair value of the investment
assets.
17
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
12. Fair Values of Financial Instruments
The Companys fuel hedging agreements are based upon NYMEX and Weekly US Department of Energy Daily
Average rates that are observable and quoted periodically over the full term of the agreement and
are considered Level 2 items.
The Companys aluminum hedging agreements are based upon LME rates that are observable and quoted
periodically over the full term of the agreement and are considered Level 2 items.
The Companys interest rate swap agreements were fair value hedges, meaning the Company received
fixed and paid variable rates based on LIBOR swap rates. LIBOR swap rates are observable and
quoted periodically over the full term of the agreements and are considered Level 2 items.
The
Company does not have Level 3 assets or liabilities.
13. Other Liabilities
Other liabilities were summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 29, |
|
Dec. 28, |
|
March 30, |
In Thousands |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
|
Accruals for executive benefit plans |
|
$ |
79,177 |
|
|
$ |
77,299 |
|
|
$ |
77,222 |
|
Other |
|
|
27,686 |
|
|
|
29,738 |
|
|
|
17,823 |
|
|
Total other liabilities |
|
$ |
106,863 |
|
|
$ |
107,037 |
|
|
$ |
95,045 |
|
|
14. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company is a member of South Atlantic Canners, Inc. (SAC), a manufacturing cooperative from
which it is obligated to purchase 17.5 million cases of finished product on an annual basis
through May 2014. The Company is also a member of Southeastern Container (Southeastern), a
plastic bottle manufacturing cooperative from which it is obligated to purchase at least 80% of
its requirements of plastic bottles for certain designated territories. See Note 19 to the
consolidated financial statements for additional information concerning SAC and Southeastern.
The Company guarantees a portion of SACs and Southeasterns debt and lease obligations. The
amounts guaranteed were $40.3 million, $39.9 million and $45.4 million as of March 29, 2009,
December 28, 2008 and March 30, 2008, respectively. The Company has not recorded any liability
associated with these guarantees and holds no assets as collateral against these guarantees. The
guarantees relate to the debt and lease obligations of SAC and Southeastern, which resulted
primarily from the purchase of production equipment and facilities. These guarantees expire at
various dates through 2021. The members of both cooperatives consist solely of Coca-Cola
bottlers. The Company does not anticipate either of these cooperatives will fail to fulfill their
commitments. The Company further believes each of these cooperatives has sufficient assets,
including production equipment, facilities and working capital, and the ability to adjust selling
prices of their products which adequately mitigate the risk of material loss from the Companys
guarantees.
18
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
14. Commitments and Contingencies
In the event either of these cooperatives fails to fulfill its commitments under the related debt
and lease obligations, the Company would be responsible for payments to the lenders up to the
level of the guarantees. If these cooperatives had borrowed up to their borrowing capacity, the
Companys maximum exposure under these guarantees on March 29, 2009 would have been $25.2 million
for SAC and $25.3 million for Southeastern and the Companys maximum total exposure, including its
equity investment, would have been $30.8 million for SAC and $38.4 million for Southeastern.
The Company has been purchasing plastic bottles from Southeastern and finished products from SAC
for more than ten years.
The Company has an equity ownership in each of the entities in addition to the guarantees of
certain indebtedness and records its investment in each under the equity method. As of March 29,
2009, SAC had total assets of approximately $42 million and total debt of approximately $21
million. SAC had total revenues for Q1 2009 of approximately $39 million. As of March 29, 2009,
Southeastern had total assets of approximately $402 million and total debt of approximately $230
million. Southeastern had total revenue for Q1 2009 of approximately $141 million.
The Company has standby letters of credit, primarily related to its property and casualty
insurance programs. On March 29, 2009, these letters of credit totaled $19.2 million.
The Company participates in long-term marketing contractual arrangements with certain prestige
properties, athletic venues and other locations. The future payments related to these contractual
arrangements as of March 29, 2009 amounted to $25.3 million and expire at various dates through
2017.
The Company is involved in various claims and legal proceedings which have arisen in the ordinary
course of its business. Although it is difficult to predict the ultimate outcome of these claims
and legal proceedings, management believes the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have
a material adverse effect on the financial condition, cash flows or results of operations of the
Company. No material amount of loss in excess of recorded amounts is believed to be reasonably
possible as a result of these claims and legal proceedings.
The Company is subject to audit by tax authorities in jurisdictions where it conducts business.
These audits may result in assessments that are subsequently resolved with the tax authorities or
potentially through the courts. Management believes the Company has adequately provided for any
assessments that are likely to result from these audits; however, final assessments, if any, could
be different than the amounts recorded in the consolidated financial statements.
19
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
15. Income Taxes
The Companys effective income tax rate for Q1 2009 and Q1 2008 was 26.4% and 32.5%, respectively.
The following table provides a reconciliation of the income tax expense (benefit) at the statutory
federal rate to actual income tax expense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
In Thousands |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Statutory expense (benefit) |
|
$ |
4,057 |
|
|
$ |
(2,247 |
) |
State income taxes (benefits), net of federal effect |
|
|
505 |
|
|
|
(279 |
) |
Manufacturing deduction benefit |
|
|
(315 |
) |
|
|
128 |
|
Meals and entertainment |
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
(103 |
) |
Adjustment for uncertain tax positions |
|
|
(1,686 |
) |
|
|
159 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
257 |
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
$ |
3,060 |
|
|
$ |
(2,085 |
) |
|
As of December 28, 2008, the Company had $10.5 million of unrecognized tax benefits, including
accrued interest, of which $9.4 million would affect the Companys effective tax rate if
recognized. As of March 29, 2009, the Company had $9.3 million of unrecognized tax benefits,
including accrued interest, of which $8.3 million would affect the Companys effective rate if
recognized. It is expected that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits may change in the next 12
months. During this period, it is reasonably possible that tax audits could reduce unrecognized
tax benefits. The Company cannot reasonably estimate the change in the amount of unrecognized tax
benefits until further information is made available during the progress of the audits.
The Company recognizes potential interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in
income tax expense. As of December 28, 2008, the Company had approximately $2.5 million of accrued
interest related to uncertain tax positions. As of March 29, 2009, the Company had approximately
$1.8 million of accrued interest related to uncertain tax positions. Income tax expense included
interest credit of approximately $.7 million in Q1 2009 and interest expense of approximately $.1
million in Q1 2008.
In Q1 2009, the Company reached an agreement with a state taxing authority to settle prior tax
positions for which the Company had previously provided reserves due to uncertainty of resolution.
As a result, the Company reduced the liability for uncertain tax positions by $1.7 million. The
net effect of the adjustment was a decrease to income tax expense of approximately $1.7 million.
Various tax years from 1990 remain open to examination by taxing jurisdictions to which the Company
is subject due to loss carryforwards.
The Companys income tax assets and liabilities are subject to adjustment in future periods based
on the Companys ongoing evaluations of such assets and liabilities and new information that
becomes available to the Company.
20
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
16. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Accumulated other comprehensive loss is comprised of adjustments relative to the Companys pension
and postretirement medical benefit plans and foreign currency translation adjustments required for
a subsidiary of the Company that performs data analysis and provides
consulting services outside the United States.
A summary of accumulated other comprehensive loss is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 28, |
|
Pre-tax |
|
Tax |
|
March 29, |
In Thousands |
|
2008 |
|
Activity |
|
Effect |
|
2009 |
|
Net pension activity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial loss |
|
$ |
(56,717 |
) |
|
$ |
2,339 |
|
|
$ |
(921 |
) |
|
$ |
(55,299 |
) |
Prior service costs |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(42 |
) |
Net postretirement benefits activity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial loss |
|
|
(9,625 |
) |
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
(9,494 |
) |
Prior service costs |
|
|
8,459 |
|
|
|
(446 |
) |
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
8,189 |
|
Transition asset |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(57,873 |
) |
|
$ |
2,098 |
|
|
$ |
(826 |
) |
|
$ |
(56,601 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 30, |
|
|
SFAS No. 158 |
|
|
Pre-tax |
|
|
Tax |
|
|
March 30, |
|
In Thousands |
|
2007 |
|
|
After tax (1) |
|
|
Activity |
|
|
Effect |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Net pension activity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial loss |
|
$ |
(12,684 |
) |
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
$ |
(43 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,593 |
) |
Prior service costs |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(52 |
) |
Net postretirement benefits activity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial loss |
|
|
(9,928 |
) |
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
(9,646 |
) |
Prior service costs |
|
|
9,833 |
|
|
|
(275 |
) |
|
|
(446 |
) |
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
9,283 |
|
Transition asset |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
30 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(12,751 |
) |
|
$ |
(114 |
) |
|
$ |
(96 |
) |
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
(12,925 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See Note 18 of the consolidated financial statements for additional information. |
17. Capital Transactions
The Company has two classes of common stock outstanding, Common Stock and Class B Common Stock.
The Common Stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Marketsm under the symbol COKE.
There is no established public trading market for the Class B Common Stock. Shares of the Class B
Common Stock are convertible on a share-for-share basis into shares of Common Stock at any time at
the option of the holders of Class B Common Stock.
21
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
17. Capital Transactions
No cash dividend or dividend of property or stock other than stock of the Company, as specifically
described in the Companys certificate of incorporation, may be declared and paid on the Class B
Common Stock unless an equal or greater dividend is declared and paid on the Common Stock. During
Q1 2009 and Q1 2008, dividends of $.25 per share were declared and paid on both Common Stock and
Class B Common Stock.
Each share of Common Stock is entitled to one vote per share and each share of Class B Common
Stock is entitled to 20 votes per share at all meetings of stockholders. Except as otherwise
required by law, holders of the Common Stock and Class B Common Stock vote together as a single
class on all matters brought before the Companys stockholders. In the event of liquidation,
there is no preference between the two classes of common stock.
On May 12, 1999, the stockholders of the Company approved a restricted stock award for J. Frank
Harrison, III, the Companys Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer,
consisting of 200,000 shares of the Companys Class B Common Stock. Under the award, shares of
restricted stock were granted at a rate of 20,000 shares per year over a ten-year period. The
vesting of each annual installment was contingent upon the Company achieving at least 80% of the
overall goal achievement factor in the Companys Annual Bonus Plan. The restricted stock award did
not entitle Mr. Harrison, III to participate in dividend or voting rights until each installment
had vested and the shares were issued. The restricted stock award expired at the end of fiscal year
2008.
On February 27, 2008, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors determined 20,000 shares
of restricted Class B Common Stock vested and should be issued to Mr. Harrison, III for the fiscal
year ended December 30, 2007. On March 4, 2009, the Compensation Committee determined an
additional 20,000 shares of restricted Class B Common Stock vested and should be issued to Mr.
Harrison, III for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2008.
Each annual 20,000 share tranche had an independent performance requirement as it was not
established until the Companys Annual Bonus Plan targets were approved each year by the Companys
Board of Directors. As a result, each 20,000 share tranche was considered to have its own service
inception date, grant-date fair value and requisite service period. The Companys Annual Bonus
Plan targets, which establish the performance requirement for the restricted stock awards, were
approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors in the first quarter of each year.
A summary of the restricted stock award was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual |
|
First Quarter |
|
|
Shares |
|
Grant-Date |
|
Compensation |
|
Compensation |
Year |
|
Awarded |
|
Price |
|
Expense |
|
Expense |
|
2008 |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
$ |
56.50 |
|
|
$ |
1,130,000 |
|
|
$ |
282,500 |
|
22
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
17. Capital Transactions
In addition, the Company reimbursed Mr. Harrison, III for income taxes to be paid on the shares if
the performance requirement was met and the shares were issued. The Company accrued the estimated
cost of the income tax reimbursement over the one-year service period.
On April 29, 2008, the stockholders of the Company approved a Performance Unit Award Agreement for
Mr. Harrison, III consisting of 400,000 performance units (Units). Each Unit represents the
right to receive one share of the Companys Class B Common Stock, subject to certain terms and
conditions. The Units will vest in annual increments over a ten-year period starting in fiscal
year 2009. The number of Units that vest each year will equal the product of 40,000 multiplied by
the overall goal achievement factor (not to exceed 100%) under the Companys Annual Bonus Plan.
The Performance Unit Award Agreement replaced the restricted stock award discussed above.
Each annual 40,000 unit tranche has an independent performance requirement as it is not
established until the Companys Annual Bonus Plan targets are approved each year by the Companys
Board of Directors. As a result, each 40,000 unit tranche is considered to have its own service
inception date and requisite service period. The Companys Annual Bonus Plan targets, which
establish the performance requirements for the Performance Unit Award Agreement, are approved by
the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors in the first quarter of each year. The
Performance Unit Award Agreement does not entitle Mr. Harrison, III to participate in dividends or
voting rights until each installment has vested and the shares are issued.
Compensation
expense recognized in Q1 2009 was $.5 million, which was based upon a share price of
$51.68 on March 27, 2009.
On February 19, 2009, The Coca-Cola Company converted all of its 497,670 shares of the Companys
Class B Common Stock into an equivalent number of shares of
the Companys Common Stock.
The increase in the total number of shares outstanding in Q1 2009 was due to the issuance of
20,000 shares of Class B Common Stock related to the restricted stock award.
The increase in the number of shares of Common Stock was due to the conversion by The Coca-Cola
Company of 497,670 shares of Class B Common Stock into 497,670 shares of Common Stock plus the
conversion of another 100 shares of Class B Common Stock into 100 shares of Common Stock. The
decrease in the number of shares of Class B Common Stock was
due to the conversion by The Coca-Cola
Company of 497,670 shares of Class B Common Stock into 497,670 shares of Common Stock plus the
conversion of another 100 shares of Class B Common Stock into
100 shares of Common Stock, offset
by the issuance of 20,000 shares of Class B Common Stock related to the restricted stock award.
The increase in the total number of shares outstanding in Q1 2008 was due to the issuance of
20,000 shares of Class B Common Stock related to the restricted stock award.
23
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
18. Benefit Plans
Recently Adopted Pronouncement
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, Employers
Accounting for Defined Pension and Other Postretirement Plans (SFAS No. 158), which was
effective for the year ending December 31, 2006 except for the requirement that the benefit plan
assets and obligations be measured as of the date of the employers statement of financial
position, which was effective for the year ending December 28, 2008. The Company adopted the
measurement date provisions of SFAS No. 158 on the first day of Q1 2008 and used the one
measurement approach. The incremental effect of applying the measurement date provisions on the
balance sheet in Q1 2008 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before |
|
|
|
|
|
After |
|
|
Application of |
|
|
|
|
|
Application of |
In Thousands |
|
SFAS No. 158 |
|
Adjustment |
|
SFAS No. 158 |
|
Pension and postretirement benefit obligations |
|
$ |
32,758 |
|
|
$ |
434 |
|
|
$ |
33,192 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
168,540 |
|
|
|
(167 |
) |
|
|
168,373 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,123,290 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
1,123,557 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
79,227 |
|
|
|
(153 |
) |
|
|
79,074 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(12,751 |
) |
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
(12,865 |
) |
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
120,504 |
|
|
|
(267 |
) |
|
|
120,237 |
|
Pension Plans
Retirement benefits under the two Company-sponsored pension plans are based on the employees
length of service, average compensation over the five consecutive years that give the highest
average compensation and average Social Security taxable wage base during the 35-year period
before reaching Social Security retirement age. Contributions to the plans are based on the
projected unit credit actuarial funding method and are limited to the amounts currently deductible
for income tax purposes. On February 22, 2006, the Board of Directors of the Company approved an
amendment to the principal Company-sponsored pension plan to cease further benefit accruals under
the plan effective June 30, 2006.
The components of net periodic pension cost (income) were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
In Thousands |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
$ |
21 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
2,788 |
|
|
|
2,701 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(2,270 |
) |
|
|
(3,410 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Recognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
2,339 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
Net periodic pension cost (income) |
|
$ |
2,884 |
|
|
$ |
(573 |
) |
|
24
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
18. Benefit Plans
The Company did not contribute to its Company-sponsored pension plans during Q1 2009. The Company
expects contributions to its two Company-sponsored pension plans during the remainder of 2009 will
be in the $8 million to $12 million range.
Postretirement Benefits
The Company provides postretirement benefits for a portion of its current employees. The Company
recognizes the cost of postretirement benefits, which consist principally of medical benefits,
during employees periods of active service. The Company does not pre-fund these benefits and has
the right to modify or terminate certain of these benefits in the future.
The components of net periodic postretirement benefit cost were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
In Thousands |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
158 |
|
|
$ |
128 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
557 |
|
|
|
536 |
|
Amortization of unrecognized transitional assets |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
Recognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
(446 |
) |
|
|
(446 |
) |
|
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost |
|
$ |
480 |
|
|
$ |
441 |
|
|
401(k) Savings Plan
The Company provides a 401(k) Savings Plan for substantially all of its employees who are not part
of collective bargaining agreements. The total cost for this benefit in Q1 2009 and Q1 2008 was
$2.3 million and $2.5 million, respectively.
On February 20, 2009, the Company announced that it would suspend matching contributions to the
401(k) Savings Plan effective April 1, 2009.
Multi-Employer Benefits
The Company entered into a new agreement in the third quarter of 2008 when one of its collective
bargaining contracts expired in July 2008. The new agreement allows the Company to freeze its
liability to Central States, a multi-employer defined benefit pension fund, while preserving the
pension benefits previously earned by the employees. As a result of freezing the Companys
liability to Central States, the Company recorded a charge of
$13.6 million in the second half of
2008. The Company paid $3.0 million in the fourth quarter of 2008 to the Southern States Savings
and Retirement Plan (Southern States) under the agreement to freeze the Central States liability.
The remaining $10.6 million was the present value amount, using a discount rate of 7% that will be
paid to Central States and was recorded in other liabilities. The Company will
pay approximately
25
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
18. Benefit Plans
$1 million annually over the next 20 years. In addition, the Company will also make future
contributions on behalf of these employees to Southern States.
19. Related Party Transactions
The Companys business consists primarily of the production, marketing and distribution of
nonalcoholic beverages of The Coca-Cola Company, which is the sole owner of the secret formulas
under which the primary components (either concentrate or syrup) of its beverage products are
manufactured. As of March 29, 2009, The Coca-Cola Company had a 27.1% interest in the Companys
total outstanding Common Stock and Class B Common Stock on a combined basis.
The following table summarizes the significant transactions between the Company and The Coca-Cola
Company:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
In Millions |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Payments by the Company for concentrate, syrup,
sweetener and other purchases |
|
$ |
83.8 |
|
|
$ |
87.3 |
|
Marketing funding support payments to the Company |
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments by the Company net of marketing funding support |
|
$ |
74.2 |
|
|
$ |
78.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments by the Company for customer marketing programs |
|
$ |
11.1 |
|
|
$ |
11.0 |
|
Payments by the Company for cold drink equipment parts |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
Fountain delivery and equipment repair fees paid to the Company |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
Presence marketing funding support provided by
The Coca-Cola Company on the Companys behalf |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Sales of finished products to The Coca-Cola Company |
|
|
.6 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
The Company has a production arrangement with Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc. (CCE) to buy and sell
finished products at cost. Sales to CCE under this arrangement were $11.1 million and $8.5 million
in Q1 2009 and Q1 2008, respectively. Purchases from CCE under this arrangement were $2.6 million
and $5.3 million in Q1 2009 and Q1 2008, respectively. The Coca-Cola Company has significant
equity interests in the Company and CCE. As of March 29, 2009, CCE held approximately 6% of the
Companys outstanding Common Stock and held no shares of the Companys Class B Common Stock.
Along with all other Coca-Cola bottlers in the United States, the Company is a member in Coca-Cola
Bottlers Sales and Services Company, LLC (CCBSS), which was formed in 2003 for the
purposes of facilitating various procurement functions and distributing certain specified beverage
products of The Coca-Cola Company with the intention of enhancing the efficiency and
competitiveness of the Coca-Cola
26
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
19. Related Party Transactions
bottling system in the United States. CCBSS negotiates the procurement for the majority of the
Companys raw materials (excluding concentrate). The Company pays an administrative fee to CCBSS
for its services.
The Company is a member of SAC, a manufacturing cooperative. SAC sells finished products to the
Company and Piedmont at cost. Purchases from SAC by the Company and Piedmont for finished products
were $30.4 million and $36.7 million in Q1 2009 and Q1 2008, respectively. The Company
also manages the operations of SAC pursuant to a management agreement. Management fees earned from
SAC were $.4 million in Q1 2009 and $.3 million in Q1 2008. The Company has also guaranteed a
portion of debt for SAC. Such guarantee amounted to $21.1 million as of March 29, 2009. The
Companys equity investment in SAC was $5.6 million, $4.1 million and $4.1 million as of March 29,
2009, December 28, 2008 and March 30, 2008, respectively.
The Company is a shareholder in two entities from which it purchases substantially all its
requirements for plastic bottles. Net purchases from these entities were $16.6 million in both Q1
2009 and Q1 2008. In connection with its participation in one of these entities, the Company has
guaranteed a portion of the entitys debt. Such guarantee amounted to $19.2 million as of March 29,
2009. The Companys equity investment in one of these entities, Southeastern, was $13.2 million,
$11.0 million and $8.2 million as of March 29, 2009, December 28, 2008 and March 30, 2008,
respectively.
The Company monitors its investments in cooperatives and would be required to write down its
investment if an impairment is identified and determined to be other than temporary. No impairment
of the Companys investments in cooperatives has been identified as of March 29, 2009.
The Company recorded an adjustment to increase its equity investment in Southeastern in the second
quarter of 2008 which resulted in a nonrecurring pre-tax credit of $2.6 million. This adjustment
was based on information received from Southeastern during the quarter and reflected a higher share
of Southeasterns retained earnings compared to the amount previously recorded. The Company
classifies its equity in earnings of Southeastern in cost of sales consistent with the
classification of purchases from Southeastern.
The Company leases from Harrison Limited Partnership One (HLP) the Snyder Production Center and
an adjacent sales facility, which are located in Charlotte, North Carolina. The lease expires on
December 31, 2010. HLP is directly and indirectly owned by trusts of which J. Frank Harrison, III,
Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Deborah H.
Everhart, a director of the Company, are trustees and beneficiaries. On March 23, 2009, the
Company modified the lease agreement (new terms to begin January 1, 2011) with HLP related to the
SPC lease. The modified lease would not have changed the classification of the existing lease had
it been in effect in the first quarter of 2002, when the capital
lease was recorded, as the Company
received a renewal option to extend the term of the lease, which it expected to exercise. The modified lease did
not extend the term of the existing lease (remaining lease term was reduced from approximately 22
years to approximately 12 years). Accordingly, the present value of the leased property under
capital leases and capital lease obligations was adjusted by an amount equal to the difference
between the future minimum lease payments under the modified lease agreement and the present value
of the existing obligation on the modification date.
27
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
19. Related Party Transactions
The
capital lease obligations and leased property under capital leases were both decreased by $7.5
million in March 2009. The annual base rent the Company is obligated to pay under the modified
lease is subject to an adjustment for an inflation factor. The prior lease annual base rent was
subject to adjustment for an inflation factor and for increases or decreases in interest rates,
using LIBOR as the measurement device. The principal balance outstanding under this capital lease
as of March 29, 2009 was $30.0 million. Rental payments related to this lease were $.9 million and
$1.0 million in Q1 2009 and Q1 2008, respectively.
The Company leases from Beacon Investment Corporation (Beacon) the Companys headquarters office
facility and an adjacent office facility. The lease expires on December 31, 2021. Beacons sole
shareholder is J. Frank Harrison, III. The principal balance outstanding under this capital lease
as of March 29, 2009 was $32.2 million. Rental payments related to the lease were $.9 million
in both Q1 2009 and Q1 2008.
20. Net Sales by Product Category
Net sales by product category were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
In Thousands |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Bottle/can sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sparkling beverages (including energy products) |
|
$ |
235,455 |
|
|
$ |
234,552 |
|
Still beverages |
|
|
46,750 |
|
|
|
53,456 |
|
|
Total bottle/can sales |
|
|
282,205 |
|
|
|
288,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales to other Coca-Cola bottlers |
|
|
31,133 |
|
|
|
28,028 |
|
Post-mix and other |
|
|
22,923 |
|
|
|
21,638 |
|
|
Total other sales |
|
|
54,056 |
|
|
|
49,666 |
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
$ |
336,261 |
|
|
$ |
337,674 |
|
|
Sparkling beverages are primarily carbonated beverages while still beverages are primarily
noncarbonated beverages.
28
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
21. Net Income (Loss) Per Share
The following table sets forth the computation of basic net income (loss) per share and diluted net
income (loss) per share under the two-class method:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
In Thousands (Except Per Share Data) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Numerator for basic and diluted net income (loss) per
Common Stock and Class B Common Stock share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
(loss) attributable to Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated |
|
$ |
8,531 |
|
|
$ |
(4,335 |
) |
Less dividends: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
1,714 |
|
|
|
1,661 |
|
Class B Common Stock |
|
|
577 |
|
|
|
625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total undistributed earnings (losses) |
|
$ |
6,240 |
|
|
$ |
(6,621 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock undistributed earnings (losses)
basic |
|
$ |
4,670 |
|
|
$ |
(4,811 |
) |
Class B Common Stock undistributed earnings (losses)
basic |
|
|
1,570 |
|
|
|
(1,810 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total undistributed earnings (losses) basic |
|
$ |
6,240 |
|
|
$ |
(6,621 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock undistributed earnings (losses) diluted |
|
$ |
4,664 |
|
|
$ |
(4,811 |
) |
Class B Common Stock undistributed earnings
(losses) diluted |
|
|
1,576 |
|
|
|
(1,810 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total undistributed earnings (losses) diluted |
|
$ |
6,240 |
|
|
$ |
(6,621 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator for basic net income (loss) per Common
Stock share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends on Common Stock |
|
$ |
1,714 |
|
|
$ |
1,661 |
|
Common Stock undistributed earnings (losses) basic |
|
|
4,670 |
|
|
|
(4,811 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator for basic net income (loss) per Common
Stock share |
|
$ |
6,384 |
|
|
$ |
(3,150 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator for basic net income (loss) per Class B
Common Stock share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends on Class B Common Stock |
|
$ |
577 |
|
|
$ |
625 |
|
Class B Common Stock undistributed earnings (losses)
basic |
|
|
1,570 |
|
|
|
(1,810 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator for basic net income (loss) per Class B
Common Stock share |
|
$ |
2,147 |
|
|
$ |
(1,185 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
21. Net Income (Loss) Per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
In Thousands (Except Per Share Data) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Numerator for diluted net income (loss) per
Common Stock share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends on Common Stock |
|
$ |
1,714 |
|
|
$ |
1,661 |
|
Dividends on Class B Common Stock
assumed converted to Common Stock |
|
|
577 |
|
|
|
625 |
|
Common Stock undistributed earnings (losses)
diluted |
|
|
6,240 |
|
|
|
(6,621 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator for diluted net income (loss) per
Common Stock share |
|
$ |
8,531 |
|
|
$ |
(4,335 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator for diluted net income (loss) per Class B
Common Stock share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends on Class B Common Stock |
|
$ |
577 |
|
|
$ |
625 |
|
Class B Common Stock undistributed earnings (losses)
diluted |
|
|
1,576 |
|
|
|
(1,810 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator for diluted net income (loss) per Class B
Common Stock share |
|
$ |
2,153 |
|
|
$ |
(1,185 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
21. Net Income (Loss) Per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
In Thousands (Except Per Share Data) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Denominator for basic net income (loss) per Common
Stock and Class B Common Stock share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock weighted average shares
outstanding basic |
|
|
6,857 |
|
|
|
6,644 |
|
Class B Common Stock weighted average shares
outstanding basic |
|
|
2,306 |
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted net income (loss) per Common
Stock and Class B Common Stock share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock weighted average shares
outstanding diluted (assumes conversion of
Class B Common Stock to Common Stock) |
|
|
9,174 |
|
|
|
9,144 |
|
Class B Common Stock weighted average shares
outstanding diluted |
|
|
2,317 |
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
$ |
.93 |
|
|
$ |
(.47 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B Common Stock |
|
$ |
.93 |
|
|
$ |
(.47 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
$ |
.93 |
|
|
$ |
(.47 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B Common Stock |
|
$ |
.93 |
|
|
$ |
(.47 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTES TO TABLE |
|
(1) |
|
For purposes of the diluted net income (loss) per share computation for Common Stock, shares
of Class B Common Stock are assumed to be converted; therefore, 100% of undistributed earnings
is allocated to Common Stock. |
|
(2) |
|
For purposes of the diluted net income (loss) per share computation for Class B Common Stock,
weighted average shares of Class B Common Stock are assumed to be outstanding for the entire
period and not converted. |
|
(3) |
|
Denominator for diluted net income per share for Common Stock and Class B Common Stock
includes the dilutive effect of shares relative to the restricted
stock awards. |
31
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
22. Risks and Uncertainties
Approximately 88% of the Companys Q1 2009 bottle/can volume to retail customers are products of
The Coca-Cola Company, which is the sole supplier of these products or of the concentrates or
syrups required to manufacture these products. The remaining 12% of the Companys Q1 2009
bottle/can volume to retail customers are products of other beverage companies and the Company.
The Company has beverage agreements under which it has various requirements to meet. Failure to
meet the requirements of these beverage agreements could result in the loss of distribution rights
for the respective product.
The Companys products are sold and distributed directly by its employees to retail stores and
other outlets. During Q1 2009, approximately 69% of the Companys bottle/can volume to retail
customers was sold for future consumption. The remaining bottle/can volume to retail customers of
approximately 31% was sold for immediate consumption. The Companys largest customers, Wal-Mart
Stores, Inc. and Food Lion, LLC, accounted for approximately 19% and
12%, respectively, of the Companys total
bottle/can volume to retail customers during Q1 2009. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
accounted for approximately 14% of the Companys total net sales
during both Q1 2009 and Q1 2008.
The Company obtains all of its aluminum cans from one domestic supplier. The Company currently
obtains all of its plastic bottles from two domestic entities. See Note 14 and Note 19 to the
consolidated financial statements for additional information.
The Company is exposed to price risk on such commodities as aluminum, corn and resin which affects
the cost of raw materials used in the production of finished products. The Company both produces
and procures these finished products. Examples of the raw materials affected are aluminum cans and
plastic bottles used for packaging and high fructose corn syrup used as a product ingredient.
Further, the Company is exposed to commodity price risk on oil which impacts the Companys cost of
fuel used in the movement and delivery of the Companys products. The Company participates in
commodity hedging and risk mitigation programs administered both by
CCBSS and by the Company.
In addition, there is no limit on the price The Coca-Cola Company and other beverage
companies can charge for concentrate.
Certain liabilities of the Company are subject to risk due to changes in both long-term and
short-term interest rates. These liabilities include floating rate debt, leases, retirement benefit obligations and the Companys pension
liability.
Approximately 7% of the Companys labor force is covered by collective bargaining agreements.
One collective bargaining contract covering
approximately .5% of the Companys employees expires during the remainder of 2009.
32
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
23. Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information
Changes in current assets and current liabilities affecting cash were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
In Thousands |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Accounts receivable, trade, net |
|
$ |
2,202 |
|
|
$ |
(14,913 |
) |
Accounts receivable from The Coca-Cola Company |
|
|
(17,403 |
) |
|
|
(10,358 |
) |
Accounts receivable, other |
|
|
1,021 |
|
|
|
1,212 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
(7,427 |
) |
|
|
(2,022 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
(2,166 |
) |
|
|
(4,143 |
) |
Accounts payable, trade |
|
|
(814 |
) |
|
|
(6,436 |
) |
Accounts payable to The Coca-Cola Company |
|
|
(1,927 |
) |
|
|
11,013 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
18,133 |
|
|
|
1,360 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
(10,173 |
) |
|
|
(10,512 |
) |
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
5,467 |
|
|
|
5,920 |
|
|
Increase in current assets less current liabilities |
|
$ |
(13,087 |
) |
|
$ |
(28,879 |
) |
|
24. New Accounting Pronouncements
Recently Adopted Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157 which defines fair value, establishes a framework
for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. The Statement does not require any new fair value
measurements but could change the current practices in measuring current fair value measurements.
The Statement was effective at the beginning of Q1 2008 for all financial assets and liabilities
and for nonfinancial assets and liabilities recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring
basis. In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position SFAS No. 157-2, Effective Date of
FASB Statement No. 157, which deferred the application date of the provisions of SFAS No. 157 for
all nonfinancial assets and liabilities until Q1 2009 except for items that are recognized or
disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. The adoption of this
Statement and Staff Position did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial
statements as of Q1 2009, but could have a material effect in the future. See Note 12 to the
consolidated financial statements for additional information.
In December 2007, the FASB revised SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations (SFAS No. 141(R)). This
Statement established principles and requirements for recognizing and measuring identifiable assets
and goodwill acquired, liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest in an acquisition, at
their fair values as of the acquisition date. The Statement is effective for Q1 2009. The impact
on the Company of adopting SFAS No. 141(R) depends on the nature, terms and size of business
combinations completed after the effective date.
33
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
24. New Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interest in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51. This Statement amended Accounting Research Bulletin No.
51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary
(commonly referred to previously as minority interest) and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary.
This Statement was effective for the Company as of the beginning of Q1 2009 and is being applied
prospectively, except for the presentation and disclosure requirements, which have been applied
retrospectively. The adoption of this Statement did not have a significant impact on the Companys
consolidated financial statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS No. 161). This Statement amends and
expands the disclosure requirements of Statement No. 133 to provide an enhanced understanding of
why an entity uses derivative instruments, how derivative instruments and related hedged items are
accounted for and how they affect an entitys financial position, financial performance and cash
flows. The Statement was effective for Q1 2009. The adoption of this Statement did not impact the
consolidated financial statements other than expanded footnote disclosures related to derivative
instruments and related hedged items. See Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements for
additional information.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of
Intangible Assets (FSP 142-3). FSP 142-3 amends the factors to be considered in developing
renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of intangible assets under SFAS
No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. The intent of FSP 142-3 is to improve the
consistency between the useful life of an intangible asset and the period of expected cash flows
used to measure its fair value. FSP 142-3 was effective for Q1 2009. The Company does not expect
FSP 142-3 to have a material impact on the accounting for future acquisitions or renewals of
intangible assets, but the potential impact is dependent upon the acquisitions or renewals of
intangible assets in the future.
In September 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 133-1 and FIN 45-4, Disclosures About
Credit Derivatives and Certain Guarantees: An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 and FASB
Interpretation No. 45, and Clarification of the Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 161 (FSP
133-1). FSP 133-1 amends Statement 133 to require a seller of credit derivatives to provide
certain disclosures for each credit derivative (or group of similar credit derivatives). FSP 133-1
also amends Interpretation No. 45 to require guarantors to disclose the current status of
payment/performance risk of guarantees and clarifies the effective date of SFAS No. 161. The
adoption of FSP 133-1 did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial
statements.
34
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
24. New Accounting Pronouncements
Recently Issued Pronouncements
In December 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 132(R)-1, Employers Disclosures about
Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets (FSP 132(R)-1). FSP 132(R)-1 requires enhanced disclosures
about plan assets of a companys defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans. The
enhanced disclosures are intended to provide users of financial statements with a greater
understanding of (1) employers investment strategies; (2) major categories of plan assets; (3)
the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of plan assets; (4) the effect
of fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) on changes in plan
assets for the period; and (5) concentration of risk within plan assets. FSP 132(R)-1 is
effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009. The adoption of this Statement will
not impact the Companys consolidated financial statements other than expanded footnote
disclosures related to the Companys pension plan assets.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the
Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and
Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly (FSP 157-4). FSP 157-4 provides guidance on (1)
estimating the fair value of an asset or liability when the volume and level of activity for the
asset or liability have significantly decreased and (2) identifying transactions that are not
orderly. FSP 157-4 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The
Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of FSP 157-4, but does not expect it to have a
material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and
Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments (FSP 115-2). FSP 115-2 amends the
other-than-temporary impairment guidance for debt securities to make the guidance more operational
and to improve the presentation and disclosure of other-than-temporary impairments on debt and
equity securities. FSP 115-2 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15,
2009. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of FSP 115-2, but does not expect it
to have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures
about Fair Value of Financial Instruments (FSP 107-1). FSP 107-1 requires disclosures about the
fair value of financial instruments in interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as
well as in annual financial statements. FSP 107-1 is effective for interim periods ending after
June 15, 2009. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of FSP 107-1, but does not
expect it to have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
35
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
25. Restructuring Expenses
On July 15, 2008, the Company initiated a plan to reorganize the structure of its operating units
and support services, which resulted in the elimination of approximately 350 positions, or
approximately 5% of its workforce. As a result of this plan, the Company incurred $4.6 million in
pre-tax restructuring expenses in 2008 for one-time termination benefits.
The following table summarizes restructuring activity, which is included in selling, delivery and
administrative expenses, for the year ended December 28, 2008 and the quarter ended March 29, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance Pay |
|
Relocation |
|
|
In Thousands |
|
and Benefits |
|
and Other |
|
Total |
|
Balance at December 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Provision |
|
|
4,559 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
4,622 |
|
Cash payments |
|
|
3,583 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
3,633 |
|
|
Balance at December 28, 2008 |
|
|
976 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
989 |
|
Provision |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash payments |
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
534 |
|
|
Balance at March 29, 2009 |
|
$ |
455 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
455 |
|
|
36
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(M,D&A) should be read in conjunction with Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidateds (the Company)
consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial
statements. M,D&A includes the following sections:
|
|
|
Our Business and the Nonalcoholic Beverage Industry a general description of the
Companys business and the nonalcoholic beverage industry. |
|
|
|
|
Areas of Emphasis a summary of
the Companys key priorities. |
|
|
|
|
Overview of Operations and Financial Condition a summary of key information and trends
concerning the financial results for the first quarter of 2009 (Q1 2009) and changes from
the first quarter of 2008 (Q1 2008). |
|
|
|
|
Discussion of Critical Accounting Policies, Estimates and New Accounting Pronouncements
a discussion of accounting policies that are most important to the portrayal of the
Companys financial condition and results of operations and that require critical judgments
and estimates and the expected impact of new accounting
pronouncements. |
|
|
|
|
Results of Operations an analysis of the Companys results of operations for Q1 2009
and Q1 2008. |
|
|
|
|
Financial Condition an analysis of the Companys financial condition as of the end of
Q1 2009 compared to year-end 2008 and the end of Q1 2008 as presented in the consolidated
financial statements. |
|
|
|
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources an analysis of capital resources, cash sources and
uses, investing activities, financing activities, off-balance sheet arrangements, aggregate
contractual obligations and hedging activities. |
|
|
|
|
Cautionary Information Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements. |
The consolidated financial statements include the consolidated operations of the Company and its
majority-owned subsidiaries including Piedmont Coca-Cola Bottling Partnership (Piedmont). The
noncontrolling interest consists of The Coca-Cola Companys interest in Piedmont, which was 22.7%
for all periods presented.
Effective December 29, 2008, the beginning of Q1 2009, the Company implemented Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 160, Noncontrolling Interest in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51. The Statement changes the accounting and reporting
standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary (commonly referred to previously as
minority interest). Piedmont is the Companys only
subsidiary that has a noncontrolling interest. Noncontrolling interest income of $.3 million in
Q1 2009 and noncontrolling interest loss of $.3 million in Q1
2008 has been reclassified to be included in net
income on the Companys consolidated statement of operations. In addition, the amount of
consolidated net income attributable to both the Company and the noncontrolling interest are shown
on the Companys consolidated statement of operations. Noncontrolling interest related to Piedmont
totaled $50.7 million, $50.4 million and $47.4 million at March 29, 2009, December 28, 2008 and
March 30, 2008, respectively. These amounts have been reclassified as noncontrolling interest in
the equity section of the Companys consolidated balance sheets.
Our Business and the Nonalcoholic Beverage Industry
The Company produces, markets and distributes nonalcoholic beverages, primarily products of The
Coca-Cola Company, which include some of the most recognized and popular beverage brands in the
world. The Company
37
is the second largest bottler of products of The Coca-Cola Company in the United States,
distributing these products in eleven states primarily in the Southeast. The Company also
distributes several other beverage brands. These product offerings include both sparkling and still
beverages. Sparkling beverages are primarily carbonated beverages including energy products.
Still beverages are primarily noncarbonated beverages such as bottled water, tea, ready to drink
coffee, enhanced water, juices and sports drinks. The Company had net sales of approximately $1.5
billion in 2008.
The nonalcoholic beverage market is highly competitive. The Companys competitors include bottlers
and distributors of nationally and regionally advertised and marketed products and private label
products. In each region in which the Company operates, between 85% and 95% of sparkling beverage
sales in bottles, cans and other containers are accounted for by the Company and its principal
competitors, which in each region includes the local bottler of Pepsi-Cola and, in some regions,
the local bottler of Dr Pepper, Royal Crown and/or 7-Up products. During the last several years,
industry sales of sugar sparkling beverages, other than energy products, have declined. The
decline in sugar sparkling beverages has generally been offset by volume growth in other
nonalcoholic product categories. The sparkling beverage category (including energy products)
represents 83% of the Companys Q1 2009 bottle/can net sales.
The principal methods of competition in the nonalcoholic beverage industry are point-of-sale
merchandising, new product introductions, new vending and dispensing equipment, packaging changes,
pricing, price promotions, product quality, retail space management, customer service, frequency of
distribution and advertising. The Company believes it is competitive in its territories with
respect to each of these methods.
Historically, operating results for the first quarter of the fiscal year have not been
representative of results for the entire fiscal year. Business seasonality results primarily from
higher unit sales of the Companys products in the second and third quarters versus the first and
fourth quarters of the fiscal year. Fixed costs, such as depreciation expense, are not
significantly impacted by business seasonality.
The Company performs its annual impairment test of franchise rights and goodwill as of the first
day of the fourth quarter. During Q1 2009, the Company believes it did not experience any events
or changes in circumstances that indicated the carrying amounts of the Companys franchise rights
or goodwill exceeded fair values. As such, the Company did not perform an interim impairment test
during Q1 2009 and did not record any impairments of franchise rights or goodwill.
Net sales by product category were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
In Thousands |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Bottle/can sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sparkling beverages (including energy products) |
|
$ |
235,455 |
|
|
$ |
234,552 |
|
Still beverages |
|
|
46,750 |
|
|
|
53,456 |
|
|
Total bottle/can sales |
|
|
282,205 |
|
|
|
288,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales to other Coca-Cola bottlers |
|
|
31,133 |
|
|
|
28,028 |
|
Post-mix and other |
|
|
22,923 |
|
|
|
21,638 |
|
|
Total other sales |
|
|
54,056 |
|
|
|
49,666 |
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
$ |
336,261 |
|
|
$ |
337,674 |
|
|
38
Areas of Emphasis
Key priorities for the Company include revenue management, product innovation and beverage
portfolio expansion, distribution cost management and productivity.
Revenue Management
Revenue management requires a strategy which reflects consideration for pricing of brands and
packages within product categories and channels, highly effective working relationships with
customers and disciplined fact-based decision-making. Revenue management has been and continues to
be a key performance driver which has significant impact on the Companys results of operations.
Product Innovation and Beverage Portfolio Expansion
Sparkling beverages volume, other than energy products, has declined over the past several years.
Innovation of both new brands and packages has been and will continue to be critical to the
Companys overall revenue. The Company began distributing Monster Energy® drinks in
certain of the Companys territories beginning in November 2008. The Company introduced the
following new products during 2007: smartwater®, vitaminwater®,
vitaminenergy, Gold Peak and Country Breeze tea products,
juice products from FUZE® (a subsidiary of
The Coca-Cola Company) and V8® juice products from the Campbell Soup Company. The
Company also modified its energy product portfolio in 2007 with the
addition of
NOS® products from FUZE®.
In October 2008, the Company entered into a distribution agreement with Hansen Beverage Company
(Hansen), the developer, marketer, seller and distributor of Monster Energy® drinks,
the leading volume brand in the U. S. energy category. Under this agreement, the Company has the
right to distribute Monster Energy® drinks in certain of the Companys territories. The
agreement has a term of 20 years and can be terminated by either party under certain circumstances,
subject to a termination penalty in certain cases. In conjunction with the execution of this
agreement, the Company was required to pay Hansen $2.3 million. This amount equals the amount that
Hansen was required to pay to the distributors of Monster Energy® drinks to terminate
the prior distribution agreements. The Company has recorded the payment to Hansen as distribution
rights and will amortize the amount on a straight-line basis to selling, delivery and
administrative (S,D&A) expenses over the 20-year term of the agreement.
In August 2007, the Company entered into a distribution agreement with Energy Brands Inc. (Energy
Brands), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Coca-Cola Company. Energy Brands, also known as
glacéau, is a producer and distributor of branded enhanced beverages including
vitaminwater®, smartwater® and vitaminenergy. The distribution
agreement was effective November 1, 2007 for a period of ten years and, unless earlier terminated,
will be automatically renewed for succeeding ten-year terms, subject to a one year non-renewal
notification by the Company. In conjunction with the execution of the distribution agreement, the
Company entered into an agreement with The Coca-Cola Company whereby the Company agreed not to
introduce new third party brands or certain third party brand extensions in the United States
through August 31, 2010 unless mutually agreed to by the Company and The Coca-Cola Company.
The Company has invested in its own brand portfolio with products such as Tum-E
Yummies, a vitamin C enhanced flavored drink, Country Breeze tea and diet Country
Breeze tea and became the exclusive licensee of Cinnabon Premium Coffee Lattes. These brands
enable the Company to participate in strong growth categories
and capitalize on distribution channels that may include the Companys traditional Coca-Cola
franchise territory as well as third party distributors outside the Companys traditional Coca-Cola
franchise territory. While the
39
growth prospects of Company-owned or exclusive licensed brands
appear promising, the cost of developing, marketing and distributing these brands is anticipated to
be significant as well.
Distribution Cost Management
Distribution costs represent the costs of transporting finished goods from Company locations to
customer outlets. Total distribution costs amounted to $45.5 million and $49.7 million in Q1 2009
and Q1 2008, respectively. Over the past several years, the Company has focused on converting its
distribution system from a conventional routing system to a predictive system. This conversion to
a predictive system has allowed the Company to more efficiently handle increasing numbers of
products. In addition, the Company has closed a number of smaller sales distribution centers over
the past several years reducing its fixed warehouse-related costs.
The Company has three primary delivery systems for its current business:
|
|
|
bulk delivery for large supermarkets,
mass merchandisers and club stores; |
|
|
|
|
advanced sales delivery for convenience stores, drug stores, small supermarkets and
certain on-premise accounts; and |
|
|
|
|
full service delivery for its full service vending
customers. |
Distribution cost management will continue to be a key area of emphasis for the Company.
Productivity
A key driver in the Companys S,D&A expense management relates to ongoing improvements in labor
productivity and asset productivity. The Company initiated plans to reorganize the structure in
its operating units and support services in July 2008. The reorganization resulted in the
elimination of approximately 350 positions, or approximately 5%, of the Companys workforce. The
Company implemented these changes in order to improve its efficiency and to help offset significant
increases in the cost of raw materials and operating expenses. The Company anticipates substantial
annual savings from this reorganization plan. The plan was completed in the fourth quarter of
2008. The Company continues to focus on its supply chain and distribution functions for ongoing
opportunities to improve productivity.
Overview of Operations and Financial Condition
The following items, which occurred in Q1 2009, affect the comparability of the financial results
presented below:
|
|
|
a $1.1 million pre-tax favorable mark-to-market adjustment to S,D&A expenses related to
the Companys 2010 fuel hedging program; |
|
|
|
|
a $.4 million pre-tax favorable mark-to-market adjustment to S,D&A expenses related to
the Companys 2009 fuel hedging program; |
|
|
|
|
a $.7 million pre-tax favorable mark-to-market adjustment to cost of sales related to
the Companys 2010 aluminum hedging program; |
|
|
|
|
a $.6 million pre-tax favorable adjustment to S,D&A expenses related to the gain on the
termination of a capital lease related to an operating facility; |
|
|
|
|
a $1.2 million pre-tax favorable
impact to S,D&A expenses due to a change in the estimate of
the useful lives of certain cold drink dispensing equipment; and |
40
|
|
|
a $1.7 million credit to income tax expense related to the agreement with a state tax
authority to settle certain prior tax positions. |
The following overview provides a summary of key information concerning the Companys financial
results for Q1 2009 compared to Q1 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
In Thousands (Except Per Share Data) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Change |
|
Change |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
336,261 |
|
|
$ |
337,674 |
|
|
$ |
(1,413 |
) |
|
|
(.4 |
) |
Gross margin |
|
|
147,129 |
|
|
|
139,918 |
|
|
|
7,211 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
S,D&A expenses |
|
|
125,988 |
|
|
|
136,243 |
|
|
|
(10,255 |
) |
|
|
(7.5 |
) |
Income from operations |
|
|
21,141 |
|
|
|
3,675 |
|
|
|
17,466 |
|
|
NM |
* |
Interest expense |
|
|
9,258 |
|
|
|
10,434 |
|
|
|
(1,176 |
) |
|
|
(11.3 |
) |
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
11,883 |
|
|
|
(6,759 |
) |
|
|
18,642 |
|
|
NM |
* |
Income tax provision (benefit) |
|
|
3,060 |
|
|
|
(2,085 |
) |
|
|
5,145 |
|
|
NM |
* |
Net income (loss) |
|
|
8,823 |
|
|
|
(4,674 |
) |
|
|
13,497 |
|
|
NM |
* |
Net income (loss) attributable to the Company |
|
|
8,531 |
|
|
|
(4,335 |
) |
|
|
12,866 |
|
|
NM |
* |
Basic net income (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
$ |
.93 |
|
|
$ |
(.47 |
) |
|
$ |
1.40 |
|
|
NM |
* |
Class B Common Stock |
|
$ |
.93 |
|
|
$ |
(.47 |
) |
|
$ |
1.40 |
|
|
NM |
* |
Diluted net income (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
$ |
.93 |
|
|
$ |
(.47 |
) |
|
$ |
1.40 |
|
|
NM |
* |
Class B Common Stock |
|
$ |
.93 |
|
|
$ |
(.47 |
) |
|
$ |
1.40 |
|
|
NM |
* |
The Companys net sales decreased .4% in Q1 2009 compared to Q1 2008. The decrease in net sales
was primarily due to a 7.0% decrease in bottle/can volume partially offset by a 5.2% increase in
average sales price per bottle/can unit. The decrease in bottle/can volume was primarily due to a
decrease in volume in all product categories except energy products. The increase in average sales
price per bottle/can unit was primarily due to increased sales prices in all product categories
except energy and enhanced water products.
Gross margin dollars increased 5.2% in Q1 2009 compared to Q1 2008. The Companys gross margin
percentage increased to 43.8% for Q1 2009 from 41.4% for Q1 2008. The increase in gross margin and
gross margin percentage was primarily due to higher sales prices per unit.
S,D&A expenses decreased 7.5% in Q1 2009 from Q1 2008. The decreases in S,D&A expenses in Q1 2009
from Q1 2008 were primarily attributable to decreases in salaries and wages, decrease in fuel
costs, decreased depreciation expense, the gain on the termination of a capital lease offset by an
increase in bad debt expense and increased employee benefit costs.
Net interest expense decreased 11.3% in Q1 2009 compared to Q1 2008. The decrease was primarily
due to lower effective interest rates and lower debt. The Companys overall weighted
average interest rate decreased to 5.6% during Q1 2009 from 5.9% during Q1 2008.
41
Net debt and capital lease obligations were summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 29, |
|
December 28, |
|
March 30, |
In Thousands |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
|
Debt |
|
$ |
591,450 |
|
|
$ |
591,450 |
|
|
$ |
633,550 |
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
65,681 |
|
|
|
77,614 |
|
|
|
79,580 |
|
|
Total debt and capital lease obligations |
|
|
657,131 |
|
|
|
669,064 |
|
|
|
713,130 |
|
Less: Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
37,996 |
|
|
|
45,407 |
|
|
|
9,930 |
|
|
Total net debt and capital lease obligations (1) |
|
$ |
619,135 |
|
|
$ |
623,657 |
|
|
$ |
703,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The non-GAAP measure Total net debt and capital lease obligations is used to
provide investors with additional information which management believes is helpful in the
evaluation of the Companys capital structure and financial
leverage. |
Discussion of Critical Accounting Policies, Estimates and New Accounting Pronouncements
Critical Accounting Policies
In the ordinary course of business, the Company has made a number of estimates and assumptions
relating to the reporting of results of operations and financial position in the preparation of its
consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates under
different assumptions and conditions. The Company included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 28, 2008 a discussion of the Companys most critical accounting policies,
which are those most important to the portrayal of the Companys financial condition and results of
operations and require managements most difficult, subjective and complex judgments, often as a
result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.
The Company did not make changes in any critical accounting policies during Q1 2009. Any changes
in critical accounting policies and estimates are discussed with the Audit Committee of the Board
of Directors of the Company during the quarter in which a change is made.
New Accounting Pronouncements
Recently Adopted Pronouncements
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 157 which
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP) and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The Statement
does not require any new fair value measurements but could change the current practices in
measuring current fair value measurements. The Statement was effective at the beginning of Q1
2008 for all financial assets and liabilities and for nonfinancial assets and liabilities
recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis. In February 2008, the FASB issued
FASB Staff Position SFAS No. 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which deferred the
application date of the provisions of SFAS No. 157 for all nonfinancial assets and liabilities
until Q1 2009 except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial
statements on a recurring basis. The adoption of this Statement and Staff Position did not have a
material impact on the consolidated financial statements as of Q1
2009, but could have a material effect in
the future. See Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.
42
In December 2007, the FASB revised SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations (SFAS No. 141(R)). This
Statement established principles and requirements for recognizing and measuring identifiable assets
and goodwill acquired, liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest in an acquisition, at
their fair values as of the acquisition date. The Statement is effective for Q1 2009. The impact
on the Company of adopting SFAS No. 141(R) depends on the nature, terms and size of business
combinations completed after the effective date.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interest in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51. This Statement amended Accounting Research Bulletin No.
51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary
(commonly referred to previously as minority interest) and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary.
This Statement was effective for the Company as of the beginning of Q1 2009 and is being applied
prospectively, except for the presentation and disclosure requirements, which have been applied
retrospectively. The adoption of this Statement did not have a significant impact on the Companys
consolidated financial statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS No. 161). This Statement amends and
expands the disclosure requirements of Statement No. 133 to provide an enhanced understanding of
why an entity uses derivative instruments, how derivative instruments and related hedged items are
accounted for and how they affect an entitys financial position, financial performance and cash
flows. The Statement was effective for Q1 2009. The adoption of this Statement did not impact the
consolidated financial statements other than expanded footnote disclosures related to derivative
instruments and related hedged items. See Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements for
additional information.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of
Intangible Assets (FSP 142-3). FSP 142-3 amends the factors to be considered in developing
renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of intangible assets under SFAS
No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. The intent of FSP 142-3 is to improve the
consistency between the useful life of an intangible asset and the period of expected cash flows
used to measure its fair value. FSP 142-3 was effective for Q1 2009. The Company does not expect
FSP 142-3 to have a material impact on the accounting for future acquisitions or renewals of
intangible assets, but the potential impact is dependent upon the acquisitions or renewals of
intangible assets in the future.
In September 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 133-1 and FIN 45-4, Disclosures About
Credit Derivatives and Certain Guarantees: An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 and FASB
Interpretation No. 45, and Clarification of the Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 161 (FSP
133-1). FSP 133-1 amends Statement 133 to require a seller of credit derivatives to provide
certain disclosures for each credit derivative (or group of similar credit derivatives). FSP 133-1
also amends Interpretation No. 45 to require guarantors to disclose the current status of
payment/performance risk of guarantees and clarifies the effective date of SFAS No. 161. The
adoption of FSP 133-1 did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial
statements.
43
Recently Issued Pronouncements
In December 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 132(R)-1, Employers Disclosures about
Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets (FSP 132(R)-1). FSP 132(R)-1 requires enhanced disclosures
about plan assets of a companys defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans. The
enhanced disclosures are intended to provide users of financial statements with a greater
understanding of (1) employers investment strategies; (2) major categories of plan assets; (3)
the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of plan assets; (4) the effect
of fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) on changes in plan
assets for the period; and (5) concentration of risk within plan assets. FSP 132(R)-1 is
effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009. The adoption of this Statement will
not impact the Companys consolidated financial statements other than expanded footnote
disclosures related to the Companys pension plan assets.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the
Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and
Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly (FSP 157-4). FSP 157-4 provides guidance on (1)
estimating the fair value of an asset or liability when the volume and level of activity for the
asset or liability have significantly decreased and (2) identifying transactions that are not
orderly. FSP 157-4 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The
Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of FSP 157-4, but does not expect it to have a
material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and
Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments (FSP 115-2). FSP 115-2 amends the
other-than-temporary impairment guidance for debt securities to make the guidance more operational
and to improve the presentation and disclosure of other-than-temporary impairments on debt and
equity securities. FSP 115-2 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15,
2009. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of FSP 115-2, but does not expect it
to have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures
about Fair Value of Financial Instruments (FSP 107-1). FSP 107-1 requires disclosures about the
fair value of financial instruments in interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as
well as in annual financial statements. FSP 107-1 is effective for interim periods ending after
June 15, 2009. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of FSP 107-1, but does not
expect it to have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
Results of Operations
Q1 2009 Compared to Q1 2008
Net Sales
Net sales decreased $1.4 million, or .4%, to $336.3 million in Q1 2009 compared to $337.7 million
in Q1 2008.
44
The decrease in net sales was a result of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Q1 2009 |
|
|
Attributable to: |
(In Millions) |
|
|
|
$ |
(18.9 |
) |
|
7.0% decrease in bottle/can volume primarily due to a volume
decrease in all product categories except energy products |
|
13.0 |
|
|
5.2% increase in bottle/can sales price per unit primarily due to higher per unit
prices in all product categories except energy and enhanced water
products |
|
1.8 |
|
|
6.0%
increase in sales price per unit for sales to other Coca-Cola
bottlers primarily due to increases in all
product categories except energy products |
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
8.8%
decrease in post-mix volume |
|
1.4 |
|
|
4.8%
increase in sales volume sold to other Coca-Cola
bottlers primarily due to a volume increase in sparkling
products |
|
1.0 |
|
|
6.4%
increase in post-mix sales price per unit |
|
1.8 |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1.4 |
) |
|
Total decrease in net sales |
|
|
|
|
In Q1 2009, the Companys bottle/can sales to retail customers accounted for 84% of the Companys
total net sales. Bottle/can net pricing is based on the invoice price charged to customers reduced
by promotional allowances. Bottle/can net pricing per unit is impacted by the price charged per
package, the volume generated in each package and the channels in which those packages are sold.
The increase in the Companys bottle/can net pricing per unit in Q1 2009 compared to Q1 2008 was
primarily due to sales price increases in all product categories, except energy products and
enhanced water products.
Product category sales volume in Q1 2009 and Q1 2008 as a percentage of total bottle/can sales
volume and the percentage change by product category was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bottle/Can Sales Volume |
|
Bottle/Can Sales Volume |
Product Category |
|
Q1 2009 |
|
Q1 2008 |
|
% Increase (Decrease) |
Sparkling beverages (including
energy products) |
|
|
86.2 |
% |
|
|
84.4 |
% |
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
Still beverages |
|
|
13.8 |
% |
|
|
15.6 |
% |
|
|
(18.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total bottle/can sales volume |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
(7.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys products are sold and distributed through various channels. These channels include
selling directly to retail stores and other outlets such as food markets, institutional accounts
and vending machine outlets. During Q1 2009, approximately 69% of the Companys bottle/can volume
was sold for future consumption. The remaining bottle/can volume of approximately 31% was sold for
immediate consumption. The Companys largest customer, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., accounted for
approximately 19% of the Companys total bottle/can volume during Q1 2009. The Companys second
largest customer, Food Lion, LLC, accounted for approximately 12% of the Companys total bottle/can
volume in Q1 2009. All of the Companys beverage sales are to customers in the United States.
The Company recorded delivery fees in net sales of $1.9 million and $1.5 million in Q1 2009 and Q1
2008, respectively. These fees are used to offset a portion of the Companys delivery and handling
costs.
45
Cost of Sales
Cost of sales includes the following: raw material costs, manufacturing labor, manufacturing
overhead including depreciation expense, manufacturing warehousing costs and shipping and handling
costs related to the movement of finished goods from manufacturing locations to sales distribution
centers.
Cost of sales decreased 4.4%, or $8.6 million, to $189.1 million in Q1 2009 compared to $197.8
million in Q1 2008.
The decrease in cost of sales was principally attributable to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Q1 2009 |
|
|
Attributable to: |
(In Millions) |
|
|
|
$ |
(10.9 |
) |
|
7.0% decrease in bottle/can volume primarily due to a volume
decrease in all product categories except energy products |
|
2.8 |
|
|
Increase in raw material costs such as
concentrate, high fructose corn syrup and aluminum, partially offset by a decrease in
purchased products |
|
1.3 |
|
|
4.8%
increase in sales volume sold to other Coca-Cola
bottlers primarily due to a volume increase in sparkling
products |
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
8.8%
decrease in post-mix volume |
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
Increase
in marketing funding support received primarily from The Coca-Cola
Company |
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
Decrease
in cost due to the Companys aluminum hedging program |
|
0.7 |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
$ |
(8.6 |
) |
|
Total decrease in cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
The Company relies extensively on advertising and sales promotion in the marketing of its products.
The Coca-Cola Company and other beverage companies that supply concentrates, syrups and finished
products to the Company make substantial marketing and advertising expenditures to promote sales in
the local territories served by the Company. The Company also benefits from national advertising
programs conducted by The Coca-Cola Company and other beverage companies. Certain of the marketing
expenditures by The Coca-Cola Company and other beverage companies are made pursuant to
annual arrangements. Although The Coca-Cola Company has advised the Company that it intends to
continue to provide marketing funding support, it is not obligated to do so under the Companys
Beverage Agreements. Significant decreases in marketing funding support from The Coca-Cola Company
or other beverage companies could adversely impact operating results of the Company in the future.
Total marketing funding support from The Coca-Cola Company and other beverage companies, which
includes direct payments to the Company and payments to customers for marketing programs, was $11.4
million for Q1 2009 compared to $10.6 million for Q1 2008.
Gross Margin
Gross margin dollars increased 5.2%, or $7.2 million, to $147.1 million in Q1 2009 compared to
$139.9 million in Q1 2008. Gross margin as a percentage of net sales increased to 43.8% for Q1
2009 from 41.4% for Q1 2008.
46
The increase in gross margin dollars was primarily the result of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Q1 2009 |
|
|
Attributable to: |
(In Millions) |
|
|
|
$ |
13.0 |
|
|
5.2% increase in bottle/can sales price per unit primarily
due to higher per unit prices in all product categories
except energy and enhanced water products |
|
(8.0 |
) |
|
7.0% decrease in bottle/can volume primarily due to a volume decrease in all product
categories except energy products |
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
Increase in raw material costs such as
concentrate, high fructose corn syrup and aluminum, partially offset by a decrease in
purchased products |
|
1.8 |
|
|
6.0%
increase in sales price per unit for sales to other Coca-Cola
bottlers primarily due to increases in all product
categories except energy products |
|
1.0 |
|
|
6.4%
increase in post-mix sales price per unit |
|
0.8 |
|
|
Increase
in marketing funding support received primarily from The Coca-Cola
Company |
|
0.7 |
|
|
Increase
in gross margin due to the Companys aluminum hedging program |
|
0.7 |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
$ |
7.2 |
|
|
Total increase in gross margin |
|
|
|
|
The increase in gross margin percentage was primarily due to higher sales prices per unit.
The Companys gross margins may not be comparable to other companies, since some entities include
all costs related to their distribution network in cost of sales. The Company includes a portion
of these costs in S,D&A expenses.
S,D&A Expenses
S,D&A expenses include the following: sales management labor costs, distribution costs from sales
distribution centers to customer locations, sales distribution center warehouse costs,
depreciation expense related to sales centers, delivery vehicles and cold drink equipment,
point-of-sale expenses, advertising expenses, cold drink equipment repair costs, amortization of
intangibles and administrative support labor and operating costs such as treasury, legal,
information services, accounting, internal control services, human resources and executive
management costs.
S,D&A expenses decreased by $10.3 million, or 7.5%, to $126.0 million in Q1 2009 from $136.2
million in Q1 2008.
47
The decrease in S,D&A expenses was primarily due to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Q1 2009 |
|
|
Attributable to: |
(In Millions) |
|
|
|
$ |
(5.7 |
) |
|
Decrease in employee salaries primarily due to the Companys
plan in July 2008 to reorganize the structure of its
operating units and support services and the elimination of
approximately 350 positions |
|
(3.6 |
) |
|
Decrease in fuel and other energy costs related to the movement of finished goods from
sales distribution centers to customer locations, including the net impact of the Companys fuel hedging program |
|
2.7 |
|
|
Increase
in employee benefit costs primarily due to higher pension plan
costs
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
Increase
in bad debt expense |
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
Decrease in depreciation expense due to a change in the useful lives of
certain cold drink dispensing equipment |
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
Gain
on the termination of a capital lease |
|
(3.9 |
) |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
$ |
(10.3 |
) |
|
Total decrease in S,D&A expenses |
|
|
|
|
Shipping and handling costs related to the movement of finished goods from manufacturing locations
to sales distribution centers are included in cost of sales. Shipping and handling costs related
to the movement of finished goods from sales distribution centers to customer locations are
included in S,D&A expenses and totaled $45.5 million and $49.7 million in Q1 2009 and Q1 2008,
respectively.
The net impact of the Companys fuel hedging program was to decrease fuel costs by $1.5 million and
$.2 million in Q1 2009 and Q1 2008, respectively.
Primarily due to the performance of the Companys pension plan investments during 2008, the
Companys expense recorded in S,D&A expenses related to the
two Company-sponsored pension plans increased by $2.9 million from a $.5 million
credit in Q1 2008 to a $2.4 million expense in Q1 2009.
On July 15, 2008, the Company initiated a plan to reorganize the structure of its operating units
and support services, which resulted in the elimination of approximately 350 positions, or
approximately 5% of its workforce. As a result of this plan, the Company incurred $4.6 million in
restructuring expenses in the second half of 2008 for one-time termination benefits. The plan was
completed in 2008 and the majority of cash expenditures occurred in 2008.
The Company entered into a new agreement with a collective bargaining unit in the third quarter of
2008. The collective bargaining unit represents approximately 270 employees, or approximately 4%
of the Companys total workforce. The new agreement allows the Company to freeze its liability to
the Central States Pension Fund (Central States), a multi-employer pension fund, while preserving
the pension benefits previously earned by the employees. As a result of the new agreement, the
Company recorded a charge of $13.6 million in the second half of 2008. The Company paid $3.0
million in 2008 to the Southern States Savings and Retirement Plan (Southern States) under this
agreement. The remaining $10.6 million was the present value amount, using a discount rate of 7%,
that will be paid under the agreement and was recorded in other liabilities. The Company will
pay approximately $1 million annually over the next 20 years to Central States. The Company will
also make future contributions on behalf of these employees to Southern States, a multi-employer
defined contribution plan. In addition, the Company incurred approximately $.4 million in expense
to settle a strike by union employees covered by this plan.
48
On February 20, 2009, the Company announced that it would suspend matching contributions to its
401(k) Savings Plan effective April 1, 2009. The Company anticipates this suspension will reduce
benefit costs in 2009 by approximately $7 million.
Interest Expense
Net interest expense decreased 11.3%, or $1.2 million, in Q1 2009 compared to Q1 2008. The
decrease in interest expense in Q1 2009 was primarily due to lower effective interest rates and
lower debt. The Companys overall weighted average interest rate decreased to 5.6%
during Q1 2009 from 5.9% during Q1 2008. See the Liquidity and Capital Resources Hedging
Activities Interest Rate Hedging section of M,D&A for additional information.
Income Taxes
The Companys effective income tax rate for Q1 2009 was 26.4% compared to 32.5% for Q1 2008. The
lower effective tax rate for Q1 2009 resulted primarily from a $1.7
million decrease in the Companys reserve
for uncertain tax positions. See Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements for additional
information. The Companys income tax rate for the remainder of
2009 is dependent upon the results of
operations and may change if the results in 2009 are different from current expectations.
The Companys income tax assets and liabilities are subject to adjustment in future periods based
on the Companys ongoing evaluations of such assets and liabilities and new information that
becomes available to the Company.
Noncontrolling Interest
The Company recorded net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest of $.3 million in Q1
2009 compared to a net loss of $.3 million in Q1 2008 related to the portion of Piedmont owned by
The Coca-Cola Company.
Financial Condition
Total assets of $1.32 billion at March 29, 2009 did not change from December 28, 2008 primarily due
to decreases in cash and cash equivalents; property, plant and equipment, net and leased property
under capital leases, net offset by increases in accounts receivable and inventories. Property,
plant and equipment, net decreased primarily due to lower levels of capital spending over the past
several years. Leased property under capital leases, net decreased primarily due to the
termination of one lease and the modification of a second lease.
Net working capital, defined as current assets less current liabilities, increased by $118.2
million to $20.4 million at March 29, 2009 from December 28, 2008 and decreased by $13.2 million at
March 29, 2009 from March 30, 2008.
Significant changes in net working capital from December 28, 2008 were as follows:
|
|
A decrease in current portion of long-term debt of $110.0 million primarily due to the
reclassification from current to long-term of $110.0 million of debentures which will be
repaid from the proceeds of a debt offering in April 2009. |
|
|
A decrease in cash and cash equivalents of $7.4 million primarily due to cash used in
operations. |
49
|
|
An increase in inventories of
$7.4 million due primarily to seasonal increase and
package changes for certain products. |
|
|
|
An increase in accounts receivable from and a decrease in accounts payable to The Coca-Cola
Company of $17.4 million and $1.9 million, respectively, primarily due to the timing of
payments. |
|
|
|
An increase in other accrued liabilities of $14.3 million primarily due to the timing of
payments. |
|
|
|
A decrease in accrued compensation of $9.7 million due primarily to the payment of bonuses
in March 2009. |
|
|
|
An increase in accrued interest payable of $5.5 million primarily due to the timing of
interest payments. |
Significant changes in net working capital from March 30, 2008 were as follows:
|
|
An increase in cash and cash equivalents of $28.1 million primarily due to cash flow from
operations. |
|
|
|
A decrease in accounts receivable, trade, net of $9.8 million primarily due to changed
credit terms for certain customers. |
|
|
|
An increase in inventories of $7.4 million primarily due to package changes for certain
products and increased raw material levels. |
|
|
|
An increase in current portion of long-term debt of $24.6 million primarily due to the
reclassification from long-term to current of $66.7 million of debentures which mature in May
2009 and July 2009
offset by lower borrowing on the Companys lines of credit. |
|
|
|
An increase in accounts receivable from and an increase in accounts payable to The
Coca-Cola Company of $6.7 million and $10.8 million, respectively, primarily due to the timing
of payments. |
|
|
|
An increase in other accrued liabilities
of $16.3 million primarily due to the timing of
payments. |
Debt and capital lease obligations were $657.1 million as of March 29, 2009 compared to $669.1
million as of December 28, 2008 and $713.1 million as of March 30, 2008. Debt and capital lease
obligations as of March 29, 2009 included $65.7 million of capital lease obligations related
primarily to Company facilities.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Capital Resources
The Companys sources of capital include cash flows from operations, available credit facilities
and the issuance of debt and equity securities. Management believes the Company has sufficient
resources available to finance its business plan, meet its working capital requirements and
maintain an appropriate level of capital spending. The amount and frequency of future dividends
will be determined by the Companys Board of Directors in light of the earnings and financial
condition of the Company at such time, and no assurance can be given that dividends will be
declared in the future.
As of March 29, 2009, the Company had $200 million available under its $200 million revolving
credit facility ($200 million facility) to meet its cash requirements. The $200 million facility
contains two financial covenants: a fixed charges coverage ratio and a debt to operating cash flow
ratio, each as defined in the credit agreement. The fixed charges coverage ratio requires the
Company to maintain a consolidated cash flow to fixed charges ratio of 1.5 to 1 or higher. The
operating cash flow ratio requires the Company to maintain a debt to cash flow ratio of 6.0 to 1 or
lower. The Company is currently in compliance with these covenants.
In April 2009, the Company issued $110 million of unsecured 7% Senior Notes due in 2019.
50
The Company has debt maturities of $119.3 million in May 2009 and $57.4 million in July 2009. On
May 1, 2009, the Company used the proceeds from the $110 million Senior Notes plus cash on hand to
repay the debt maturity of $119.3 million. The Company anticipates using cash flow generated from
operations and its $200 million facility to repay the $57.4 million debt maturity in July. The
Company currently has, and anticipates it will continue to have, capacity under its $200 million
facility and cash on hand to repay the $57.4 million of debt
maturity in
July 2009.
The Company currently believes that all of the banks
participating in the Companys $200 million facility have the ability to and will meet any funding
requests from the Company.
The Company has obtained the majority of its long-term financing, other than capital leases, from
public markets. As of March 29, 2009, $591.5 million of the Companys total outstanding balance of
debt and capital lease obligations of $657.1 million was financed through publicly offered debt.
The Company had capital lease obligations of $65.7 million as of March 29, 2009. There were no
amounts outstanding on the $200 million facility as of March 29, 2009.
Cash Sources and Uses
The primary sources of cash for the Company have been cash provided by operating activities,
investing activities and financing activities. The primary uses of cash have been for capital
expenditures, the payment of debt and capital lease obligations, dividend payments and income tax
payments.
A summary of activity for Q1 2009 and Q1 2008 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
In Millions |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Cash Sources |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities (excluding income tax payments) |
|
$ |
2.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Proceeds from lines of credit, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
34.7 |
|
Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
.1 |
|
|
|
.2 |
|
|
Total cash sources |
|
$ |
2.6 |
|
|
$ |
34.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Uses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in operating activities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
16.3 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
|
Investment in plastic bottle manufacturing cooperative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
.7 |
|
Payment of debt and capital lease obligations |
|
|
.6 |
|
|
|
.6 |
|
Dividends |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
Income tax payments |
|
|
.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
.1 |
|
|
|
.1 |
|
|
Total cash uses |
|
$ |
10.0 |
|
|
$ |
34.8 |
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash |
|
$ |
(7.4 |
) |
|
$ |
.1 |
|
|
Investing Activities
Additions to property, plant and equipment during Q1 2009 were $6.2 million compared to $14.8
million during Q1 2008. Capital expenditures during Q1 2009 were funded with cash flows from
operations. The Company anticipates total additions to property, plant and equipment in fiscal year 2009 will be in the
range of $45 million to $60 million. Leasing is used for certain capital additions when considered
cost effective relative to other
51
sources of capital. The Company currently leases its corporate
headquarters, two production facilities and several sales distribution facilities and
administrative facilities.
Financing Activities
On March 8, 2007, the Company entered into a $200 million facility replacing its $100 million
credit facility. The $200 million facility matures in March 2012 and includes an option to extend
the term for an additional year at the discretion of the participating banks. The $200 million
facility bears interest at a floating base rate or a floating rate of LIBOR plus an interest rate
spread of .35%, dependent on the length of the term of the borrowing. In addition, the Company
must pay an annual facility fee of .10% of the lenders aggregate commitments under the facility.
Both the interest rate spread and the facility fee are determined from a commonly-used pricing
grid based on the Companys long-term senior unsecured debt rating. The $200 million facility
contains two financial covenants: a fixed charges coverage ratio and a debt to operating cash
flow ratio, each as defined in the credit agreement. The fixed charges coverage ratio requires
the Company to maintain a consolidated cash flow to fixed charges ratio of 1.5 to 1 or higher.
The operating cash flow ratio requires the Company to maintain a debt to cash flow ratio of 6.0 to
1 or lower. On August 25, 2008, the Company entered into an amendment to the $200 million
facility. The amendment clarified that charges incurred by the Company resulting from the
Companys withdrawal from Central States would be excluded from the calculations of the financial
covenants to the extent they are recognized before March 29, 2009 and do not exceed $15 million.
See Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements for additional details on the withdrawal.
The Company is currently in compliance with these covenants and the amendment to the $200 million
facility. These covenants do not currently, and the Company does not
anticipate they will, restrict its liquidity or capital resources. There were no amounts outstanding under the $200 million facility at March 29, 2009,
December 28, 2008 and March 30, 2008.
The Company borrows periodically under an uncommitted line of credit provided from a bank
participating in the $200 million facility. This uncommitted line of credit made available at the
discretion of the participating bank was temporarily terminated in the fourth quarter of 2008. In
January 2009, the participating bank reinstated their uncommitted line of credit for $65 million.
This uncommitted line of credit was terminated after March 29, 2009. There were no amounts
outstanding under uncommitted lines of credit at March 29, 2009.
In April 2009, the Company issued $110 million of 7% Senior Notes due in 2019. The proceeds plus
cash on hand were used to repay a $119.3 million debt maturity on May 1, 2009.
All of the outstanding debt has been issued by the Company with none having been issued by any of
the Companys subsidiaries. There are no guarantees of the Companys debt. The Company or its
subsidiaries have entered into four capital leases.
At March 29, 2009, the Companys credit ratings were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Debt |
Standard & Poors |
|
BBB |
Moodys |
|
Baa2 |
The Companys credit ratings are reviewed periodically by the respective rating agencies. Changes
in the Companys operating results or financial position could result in changes in the Companys
credit ratings. Lower credit ratings could result in higher borrowing costs for the Company or reduced access to capital
markets, which could have a material impact on the Companys financial position or results of
operations. There were no changes in these credit ratings from the
prior year and the credit ratings are currently stable.
52
The Companys public debt is not subject to financial covenants but does limit the incurrence of
certain liens and encumbrances as well as indebtedness by the Companys subsidiaries in excess of
certain amounts.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company is a member of two manufacturing cooperatives and has guaranteed $40.3 million of debt
and related lease obligations for these entities as of March 29, 2009. In addition, the Company
has an equity ownership in each of the entities. The members of both cooperatives consist solely
of Coca-Cola bottlers. The Company does not anticipate either of these cooperatives will fail to
fulfill their commitments. The Company further believes each of these cooperatives has sufficient
assets, including production equipment, facilities and working capital, and the ability to adjust
selling prices of their products to adequately mitigate the risk of material loss from the
Companys guarantees. As of March 29, 2009, the Companys maximum exposure, if the entities
borrowed up to their borrowing capacity, would have been $69.2 million including the Companys
equity interests. See Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information
about these entities.
Aggregate Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes the Companys contractual obligations and commercial commitments as
of March 29, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr. 2009- |
|
Apr. 2010- |
|
Apr. 2012- |
|
After |
In Thousands |
|
Total |
|
Mar. 2010 |
|
Mar. 2012 |
|
Mar. 2014 |
|
Mar. 2014 |
|
Contractual obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt, net of interest |
|
$ |
591,450 |
|
|
$ |
66,693 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
150,000 |
|
|
$ |
374,757 |
|
Capital lease obligations,
net of interest |
|
|
65,681 |
|
|
|
3,557 |
|
|
|
7,762 |
|
|
|
8,634 |
|
|
|
45,728 |
|
Estimated interest on
long-term debt and capital
lease obligations (1) |
|
|
231,129 |
|
|
|
35,059 |
|
|
|
65,763 |
|
|
|
54,978 |
|
|
|
75,329 |
|
Purchase obligations (2) |
|
|
483,884 |
|
|
|
93,655 |
|
|
|
187,310 |
|
|
|
187,310 |
|
|
|
15,609 |
|
Other long-term liabilities (3) |
|
|
109,086 |
|
|
|
7,441 |
|
|
|
14,521 |
|
|
|
13,631 |
|
|
|
73,493 |
|
Operating leases |
|
|
20,480 |
|
|
|
3,521 |
|
|
|
4,988 |
|
|
|
3,145 |
|
|
|
8,826 |
|
Long-term contractual
arrangements (4) |
|
|
25,319 |
|
|
|
6,876 |
|
|
|
11,146 |
|
|
|
6,988 |
|
|
|
309 |
|
Postretirement obligations |
|
|
37,068 |
|
|
|
2,291 |
|
|
|
4,811 |
|
|
|
5,200 |
|
|
|
24,766 |
|
Purchase orders (5) |
|
|
34,579 |
|
|
|
34,579 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations |
|
$ |
1,598,676 |
|
|
$ |
253,672 |
|
|
$ |
296,301 |
|
|
$ |
429,886 |
|
|
$ |
618,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes interest payments based on contractual terms, current interest rates for variable
rate debt and interest related to the $110 million Senior Notes
issued in April 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents an estimate of the Companys obligation to purchase 17.5 million cases of
finished product on an annual basis through May 2014 from South Atlantic Canners, a
manufacturing cooperative. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes obligations under executive benefit plans, unrecognized income tax benefits, the
liability to exit from a multi-employer pension plan and other
long-term liabilities. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes contractual arrangements with certain prestige properties, athletics venues and
other locations, and other long-term marketing commitments. |
|
(5) |
|
Purchase orders include commitments in which a written purchase order has been issued to a
vendor, but the goods have not been received or the services have not
been performed. |
53
The Company has $9.3 million of unrecognized income tax benefits including accrued interest as of
March 29, 2009 (included in other long-term liabilities in the table above) of which $8.3 million
would affect the Companys effective tax rate if recognized. It is expected that the amount of
unrecognized tax benefits may change in the next 12 months. During this period, it is reasonably
possible that tax audits could reduce unrecognized tax benefits. The Company cannot reasonably
estimate the change in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits until further information is made
available during the progress of the audits. See Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements
for additional information.
The Company is a member of Southeastern Container, a plastic bottle manufacturing cooperative,
from which the Company is obligated to purchase at least 80% of its requirements of plastic
bottles for certain designated territories. This obligation is not included in the Companys
table of contractual obligations and commercial commitments since there are no minimum purchase
requirements.
As of March 29, 2009, the Company has $19.2 million of standby letters of credit, primarily
related to its property and casualty insurance programs. See Note 14 to the consolidated
financial statements for additional information related to commercial commitments, guarantees,
legal and tax matters.
The Company has not contributed to its two Company-sponsored pension plans in Q1 2009. The
Company anticipates that it will be required to make contributions to its two Company-sponsored
pension plans in 2009. Based on information currently available, the Company estimates cash
contributions in the remainder of 2009 will be in the range of $8 million to $12 million.
Postretirement medical care payments are expected to be approximately $2.3 million in 2009. See
Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to pension and
postretirement obligations.
Hedging Activities
Interest Rate Hedging
The Company periodically uses interest rate hedging products to mitigate risk from interest rate
fluctuations. The Company has historically altered its fixed/floating rate mix based upon
anticipated cash flows from operations relative to the Companys debt level and the potential
impact of changes in interest rates on the Companys overall financial condition. Sensitivity
analyses are performed to review the impact on the Companys financial position and coverage of
various interest rate movements. The Company does not use derivative financial instruments for
trading purposes nor does it use leveraged financial instruments.
In September 2008, the Company terminated six interest rate swap agreements with a notional amount
of $225 million it had outstanding. The Company received $6.2 million in cash proceeds including
$1.1 million for previously accrued interest receivable. After accounting for the previously
accrued interest receivable, the Company will amortize a gain of $5.1 million over the remaining
term of the underlying debt.
Interest expense was reduced due to the amortization of deferred gains on previously terminated
interest rate swap agreements and forward interest rate agreements by $.9 million and $.4 million
during Q1 2009 and in Q1 2008, respectively.
The weighted average interest rate of the Companys debt and capital lease obligations after taking
into account all of the interest rate hedging activities was 5.6% as of March 29, 2009 compared to
5.9% as of December 28,
2008 and 5.9% as of March 30, 2008. Approximately 4.6% of the Companys debt and capital lease obligations
54
of $657.1 million as of March 29, 2009 was maintained on a floating rate basis and was
subject to changes in short-term interest rates.
Fuel Hedging
The
Company uses derivative instruments to hedge all of the
Companys projected diesel fuel
purchases for 2009 and 2010. These derivative instruments relate to diesel fuel used by the Companys delivery
fleet. The Company pays a fee for these instruments which is amortized over the corresponding
period of the instrument. The Company accounts for its fuel hedges on a mark-to-market basis with
any expense or income being reflected as an adjustment of fuel costs.
The net impact of the Companys fuel hedging program was to decrease fuel costs by $1.5 million and
$.2 million in Q1 2009 and Q1 2008, respectively.
In
October 2008, the Company entered into derivative contracts to
hedge all of its projected diesel
fuel purchases for 2009 establishing an upper and lower limit on the Companys price of diesel
fuel.
In
February 2009, the Company entered into derivative contracts to
hedge all of its projected diesel
purchases for 2010 establishing an upper limit on the Companys price of diesel fuel.
Aluminum Hedging
At the
end of Q1 2009, the Company began using derivative instruments to
hedge 75% of the
Companys projected 2010 aluminum purchase requirements. The Company pays a fee for these instruments which is amortized
over the corresponding period of the instruments. The Company accounts for its aluminum hedges on
a mark-to-market basis with any expense or income being reflected as an adjustment to cost of
sales.
The net impact of the Companys aluminum hedging program was to decrease cost of sales by $.7
million in Q1 2009.
Subsequent
to Q1 2009, the Company entered into derivative contracts to hedge 75% of the
Companys projected 2011 aluminum purchase requirements.
55
Cautionary Information Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as well as information included in future filings by the
Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission and information contained in written material,
press releases and oral statements issued by or on behalf of the Company, contains, or may contain,
forward-looking management comments and other statements that reflect managements current outlook
for future periods. These statements include, among others, statements relating to:
|
|
|
the Companys belief that other parties to certain contractual arrangements will perform
their obligations; |
|
|
|
|
potential marketing funding support from The Coca-Cola Company and other beverage
companies; |
|
|
|
|
the Companys belief that disposition of certain claims and legal proceedings will not
have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, cash flows or results of
operations and that no material amount of loss in excess of recorded amounts is reasonably
possible; |
|
|
|
|
managements belief that the Company has adequately provided for any ultimate amounts
that are likely to result from tax audits; |
|
|
|
|
managements belief that the Company has sufficient resources available to finance its
business plan, meet its working capital requirements and maintain an appropriate level of
capital spending; |
|
|
|
|
the Companys belief that the cooperatives whose debt and lease obligations the Company
guarantees have sufficient assets and the ability to adjust selling prices of their
products to adequately mitigate the risk of material loss and that the cooperatives will
perform their obligations under their debt and lease agreements; |
|
|
|
|
the Companys key priorities which are revenue management, product innovation and
beverage portfolio expansion, distribution cost management and
productivity; |
|
|
|
|
the Companys hypothetical
calculation of the impact of a 1% increase in interest rates on
outstanding floating rate debt and capital lease obligations for the
next twelve months as of March 29, 2009; |
|
|
|
|
the Companys belief that cash contributions in 2009 to its two Company-sponsored
pension plans will be in the range of $8 million to
$12 million; |
|
|
|
|
the Companys belief that postretirement medical care payments are expected to be
approximately $2.3 million in 2009; |
|
|
|
|
the Companys expectation that additions to property, plant and equipment in 2009 will
be in the range of $45 million to $60 million; |
|
|
|
|
the Companys beliefs and estimates regarding the impact of the adoption of certain new
accounting pronouncements; |
|
|
|
|
the Companys beliefs that the growth prospects of Company-owned or exclusive licensed
brands appear promising and the cost of developing, marketing and distributing these brands
may be significant; |
|
|
|
|
the Companys expectation that unrecognized tax benefits may be reduced over the next 12
months as a result of tax audits; |
|
|
|
|
the Companys expectation that it will use cash flow generated from operations, its $200
million credit facility and the proceeds from the $110 million Senior Notes offering in
April 2009 to repay or refinance debentures maturing in
May 2009 and July 2009; |
|
|
|
|
the Companys belief that all of the banks participating in the Companys $200 million
facility have the ability to and will meet any funding requests from
the Company; |
|
|
|
|
the Companys belief that it is competitive in its territories with respect to the
principal methods of competition in the nonalcoholic beverage
industry; |
56
|
|
|
the Companys estimate that a 10% increase in the market price of certain commodities
over the current market prices would cumulatively increase costs during the next 12 months
by approximately $21 million assuming flat volume; |
|
|
|
|
the Companys anticipation that pension expense related to the two Companys sponsored
pension plans is estimated to be approximately $11.6 million in
2009; |
|
|
|
|
the Companys anticipation that the suspension of matching contributions to its 401(k)
Savings Plan will reduce benefit costs by approximately
$7 million in 2009; |
|
|
|
|
the Companys expectation that its overall bottle/can revenue will be primarily
dependent upon continued growth in diet sparkling products, sports drinks, enhanced water
and energy products, the introduction of new products and the pricing of brands and
packages within channels; |
|
|
|
|
the Companys belief that the
majority of its deferred tax assets will be realized; |
|
|
|
|
the Companys belief that innovation of new brands and packages will continue to be
critical to the Companys overall revenue; and |
|
|
|
|
the Companys belief that its
restructuring plan in 2008 will continue to result in substantial
cost savings. |
These statements and expectations are based on currently available competitive, financial and
economic data along with the Companys operating plans, and are subject to future events and
uncertainties that could cause anticipated events not to occur or actual results to differ
materially from historical or anticipated results. Factors that could impact those differences or
adversely affect future periods include, but are not limited to, the factors set forth in Part II,
Item 1A. of this Form 10-Q and in Item 1A. Risk Factors of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 28, 2008.
Caution should be taken not to place undue reliance on the Companys forward-looking statements,
which reflect the expectations of management of the Company only as of the time such statements are
made. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
57
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
The Company is exposed to certain market risks that arise in the ordinary course of business. The
Company may enter into derivative financial instrument transactions to manage or reduce market
risk. The Company does not enter into derivative financial instrument transactions for trading
purposes. A discussion of the Companys primary market risk exposure and interest rate risk is
presented below.
Debt and Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company is subject to interest rate risk on its fixed and floating rate debt. The Company
periodically uses interest rate hedging products to modify risk from interest rate fluctuations.
The Company has historically altered its fixed/floating rate mix based upon anticipated cash flows
from operations relative to the Companys overall financial condition. Sensitivity analyses are
performed to review the impact on the Companys financial position and coverage of various interest
rate movements. The counterparties to these interest rate hedging arrangements were major
financial institutions with which the Company also has other financial relationships. The Company
did not have any interest rate hedging products as of March 29, 2009. The Company generally
maintains between 40% and 60% of total borrowings at variable interest rates after taking into
account all of the interest rate hedging activities. While this is the target range for the
percentage of total borrowings at variable interest rates, the financial position of the Company
and market conditions may result in strategies outside of this range at certain points in time.
Approximately 4.6% of the Companys debt and capital lease obligations of $657.1 million as of
March 29, 2009 was subject to changes in short-term interest rates.
As it
relates to the Companys variable rate debt and variable rate
leases, assuming no changes in the Companys financial
structure, if market interest rates average 1% more over the next
twelve months than the interest rates as of March 29, 2009,
interest expense for the following twelve months would increase by
approximately $.1 million. This amount was determined by
calculating the effect of the hypothetical interest rate on the
Companys variable rate debt and variable rate leases. This calculated,
hypothetical increase in interest expense for the following twelve
months may be different from the actual increase in interest expense
from a 1% increase in interest rates due to varying interest rate
reset dates on the Companys floating rate debt.
Raw Material and Commodity Price Risk
The Company is also subject to commodity price risk arising from price movements for certain other
commodities included as part of its raw materials. The Company manages this commodity price risk
in some cases by entering into contracts with adjustable prices. The Company has not historically
used derivative commodity instruments in the management of this risk. The Company estimates that a
10% increase in the market prices of these commodities over the current market prices would
cumulatively increase costs during the next 12 months by approximately $21 million assuming flat
volume.
The
Company uses derivative instruments to hedge all of the
Companys projected diesel fuel
purchases for 2009 and 2010. These derivative instruments relate to diesel fuel used by the Companys delivery
fleet. The Company pays a fee for these instruments which is amortized over the corresponding
period of the instrument. The Company currently accounts for its fuel hedges on a mark-to-market
basis with any expense or income being reflected as an adjustment of fuel costs.
At the
end of Q1 2009, the Company began using derivative instruments to
hedge 75% of its
projected 2010 aluminum purchase requirements. Subsequent to Q1 2009, the Company entered into derivative contracts to
hedge 75% of the Companys projected 2011 aluminum purchase requirements. The Company pays a fee for these instruments which is
amortized over
58
the corresponding period of the instruments. The Company accounts for its aluminum
hedges on a mark-to-market basis with any expense or income being reflected as an adjustment to
cost of sales.
Effects of Changing Prices
The principal effect of inflation on the Companys operating results is to increase costs. The
Company may raise selling prices to offset these cost increases; however, the resulting impact on
retail prices may reduce the volume of product purchased by consumers.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation, under
the supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including the Companys
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act)), pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) of the
Exchange Act. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
concluded the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective for the purpose of
providing reasonable assurance the information required to be disclosed in the reports the Company
files or submits under the Exchange Act (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to
the Companys management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
There has been no change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting during the
quarter ended March 29, 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
59
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
There have been no material changes to the factors disclosed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2008.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
On
February 19, 2009, The Coca-Cola Company converted all of its 497,670 shares of the Companys
Class B Common Stock into an equivalent number of shares of the
Companys Common Stock. The
shares of Common Stock were issued to The Coca-Cola Company without registration under Section
3(a)(9) of the Securities Act.
On
March 4, 2009, 20,000 shares of restricted Class B Common Stock, $1.00 par value, vested and
were issued pursuant to a performance-based award to J. Frank Harrison, III, in connection with
his services in 2008 as Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company. The shares of Class B Common Stock were issued to Mr. Harrison, III without registration
under the Securities Act in reliance on Section 4(2) of the
Securities Act.
60
Item 6. Exhibits.
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
The registrant, by signing this report, agrees to furnish the Securities and
Exchange Commission, upon its request, a copy of any instrument which defines the
rights of holders of long-term debt of the registrant and its consolidated
subsidiaries which authorizes a total amount of securities not in excess of 10 percent
of the total assets of the registrant and its subsidiaries on a
consolidated basis. |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Stock Rights and Restriction Agreement, dated February 19,
2009, by and among the Company, The Coca-Cola Company and J. Frank Harrison, III,
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on February 19, 2009 (File
No. 0-9286). |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Termination of Irrevocable Proxy and Voting Agreement, dated February 19, 2009,
by and between The Coca-Cola Company and J. Frank Harrison, III, incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
February 19, 2009 (File No. 0-9286). |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Lease Agreement, dated March 23, 2009, between the Company and Harrison Limited
Partnership One, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 26, 2009 (File
No. 0-9286). |
|
|
|
12
|
|
Ratio of
earnings to fixed charges (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed
herewith). |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed
herewith). |
|
|
|
32
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed
herewith). |
61
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED |
|
|
|
|
(REGISTRANT)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 8, 2009
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ James E. Harris |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James E. Harris |
|
|
|
|
Principal Financial Officer of the Registrant |
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
May 8, 2009
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ William J. Billiard |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William J. Billiard |
|
|
|
|
Principal Accounting Officer of the Registrant |
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
|
Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |
62
EX-12
Exhibit 12
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(In Thousands, Except Ratios)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Computation
of Earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
$ |
11,883 |
|
|
$ |
(6,759 |
) |
Add: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
8,693 |
|
|
|
9,820 |
|
Amortization of debt premium/discount and expenses |
|
|
603 |
|
|
|
615 |
|
Interest portion of rent expense |
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings as adjusted |
|
$ |
21,525 |
|
|
$ |
3,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Computation of Fixed Charges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
8,693 |
|
|
$ |
9,820 |
|
Capitalized interest |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
Amortization of debt premium/discount and expenses |
|
|
603 |
|
|
|
615 |
|
Interest portion of rent expense |
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed charges |
|
$ |
9,721 |
|
|
$ |
10,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges |
|
|
2.21 |
|
|
|
0.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EX-31.1
Exhibit 31.1
MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION
I, J. Frank Harrison, III, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles; |
|
|
c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and |
|
|
d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
|
a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and |
|
|
b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ J. Frank Harrison, III |
|
|
|
Date:
May 8, 2009
|
|
J. Frank Harrison, III
Chairman of the Board of Directors
and Chief Executive Officer |
EX-31.2
Exhibit 31.2
MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION
I, James E. Harris, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles; |
|
|
c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and |
|
|
d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
|
a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and |
|
|
b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ James E. Harris |
|
|
|
Date:
May 8, 2009
|
|
James E. Harris
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
EX-32
Exhibit 32
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 29, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, J. Frank Harrison, III, Chairman of the Board of
Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and James E. Harris, Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ J. Frank Harrison, III |
|
J. Frank Harrison, III
Chairman of the Board of Directors and
Chief Executive Officer
May 8, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ James E. Harris |
|
James E. Harris
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
May 8, 2009 |